Russell Moreton : Matter(s) in Correspondence

Spatial practices of clay, ceramic, drawing, bodies, places and making.

Spatial Practice

Architecture, sites, spatial situations, bodies, inhabitation, installations, spatial propositions.

Ceramic Bodies

Clay, ceramic sculpture, vessels, apertures, surfaces, firing, ceramic interiors, ceramic atmospheres.

Drawing / Image

Drawing, cyanotype, photography, diagram, mapping, collage, visual experiments.

Interiority / Atmosphere

Bachelard, refuge, reverie, innerness, thresholds, chambers, light, shadow, atmosphere, sensing.

Making / Materiality

Studio practice, making, material resistance, gesture, process, firing, construction, surface, force.

Research / Working Texts

Reading, theoretical writing, notes, research propositions, older texts being re-entered, speculative learning.

  • The touching happens between things. Intervals of Exposure~Interiority

    A body of allure, speculative gathering and withdrawn spatial interiority.

    Spatial Practice~Reading Apparatus.

    What happens when another body enters making without becoming its subject?

    An image, a remembered space, a reading or another body may enter clay not as something to be represented, but as a correspondence: a force passing between bodies, gathering within material and becoming otherwise.

    The research collage becomes a spatial body in which these encounters can remain partially withdrawn. Fragments approach without quite meeting. An interior is proposed without being enclosed. Something becomes perceptible without becoming entirely available.

    Through clay, these correspondences acquire another condition. Through firing, they become materially persistent.

    Yet what persists is not the image, the idea or the body as such. What persists is a relation capable of further becoming.

    Vicarious touching names this uncertain proximity: a touching without direct contact, where one body may become entangled with another across an interval of material, image, atmosphere and time.

    The withdrawn ceramic carries these soundings forward.

    Its apertures, surfaces and interiorities offer enough to awaken curiosity, while retaining something of their withdrawal. The ceramic does not ask another body to enter. It makes another body curious about entering.

    Perhaps this is the allure of the permeable chamber: a room for the curiosity of other bodies.

    What has surfaced may withdraw.
    What has withdrawn may surface otherwise.

    The body persists. The correspondence remains~in~play.

    Vicarious Touching ~ Persistent Becoming

    Vicarious touching becomes more than a description of how bodies relate. Within Russell Moreton’s spatial practice, it becomes a body of allure: a spatial force that sets something in motion without determining what that something will become. It is a touching at a distance that creates the conditions for another body to become curious.


    When other bodies enter the clay and subsequently the withdrawn ceramic, they become vicariously entangled through the material relations of making. An image, a body, a remembered space, a reading or an architectural proposition may enter the clay as another force within its becoming. The clay becomes a site of speculative gathering in which these bodies encounter one another without becoming a single body.


    Francesca Woodman’s photographic body enters this field as one such correspondent body. It is encountered through image, reading, looking and correspondence before becoming materially implicated within the bodies of clay. What passes between these bodies is not direct contact, but a vicarious touching: an encounter at a distance in which something of one body becomes capable of affecting another without becoming identical to it.


    The movement is therefore not one of representation but of transformation:
    Woodman’s body → image → reading body → clay → ceramic body → encounter


    At each stage, the body changes condition. What enters the clay is not an image preserved intact, but a correspondence: something of the spatial tension between body, wall, aperture, concealment, exposure and interiority.

    The photographic body becomes implicated in another spatial body, where its correspondence can acquire a different material existence.
    Through firing, this gathering is withdrawn into ceramic.


    What was provisional becomes materially persistent. What had been encountered through an image acquires another condition of existence. Woodman’s body is neither simply present as photographic representation nor entirely absent. It becomes part of a surfacingforce, a trace of correspondence that has changed its material condition.


    The ceramic therefore becomes a permeable withdrawn interiority, made durable through firing but never closed by it. Its surfaces, holes, intervals and chambers carry the possibility of encounters that exceed the circumstances of its making.


    Here, allure becomes spatially consequential.


    The ceramic gives something to encounter while withholding the totality of what has entered it. Bodies gathered through research remain partially withdrawn. They can be sensed without being possessed, encountered without being fully recovered. The force of their correspondence persists through this withdrawal.

    The persistent ceramic body becomes a body of other bodies, but not a container of them.
    Its persistence is therefore not the persistence of a represented body. It is the persistence of a relation that has become capable of further becoming.


    Allure ~ Vicarious Touching ~ Spatial Interiority.


    The research collage is another persistent body within this movement. Images, drawings, architectural fragments, material traces and textual residues are brought into proximity, but their relations remain partially withdrawn. Something passes between them without becoming fully possessed by any one of them.


    The collage produces an interior that is never quite given as an interior. A darkened figure, an opening, a grid, a drawn line, a black field or an overlaid surface gives enough for an interior proposition to begin while withholding the possibility of fully entering it.


    Allure therefore becomes less an attraction towards an object than a forcefeeling generated through uncertain proximity.


    The touching happens between things.


    The research collage becomes a speculative spatial body: an interiority produced through fragments that do not quite meet. Its spaces are intervals rather than rooms, openings rather than entrances, propositions rather than representations.


    In this sense, the collage does not simply precede the ceramic as preparatory research. It is already thinking spatially through withdrawal. It tests how an interior might be sensed before it is materially constructed; how a chamber might be proposed without becoming inhabitable; and how bodies might encounter one another across a distance.


    The ceramic does not reproduce the collage.
    It withdraws its spatial propositions into another body.


    Between collage and ceramic emerges a spatial interval~interiority: a condition in which touching can occur without direct contact, where correspondence is felt across distance, and where a proposition can remain present precisely because it is not completely available.
    The allure of the research collage is therefore its capacity to touch the ceramic before the ceramic exists.

    A Room for the Curiosity of Other Bodies.


    Vicarious touching does not seek to complete an encounter between bodies. It opens a spatially driven room for the curiosity of other bodies.
    The room is not necessarily architectural. It is a propositional interiority produced between bodies that remain partially withdrawn from one another. Something is sensed without being entirely disclosed; something approaches without being required to arrive. The ceramic body offers an interiority that is permeable yet withdrawn, making space for another body to wonder what might be encountered within, around or beyond it.


    The allure is therefore an incomplete encounter.


    A surface, aperture, chamber, trace or image gives enough to set curiosity in motion while retaining something of its withdrawal. Through vicarious touching, the bodies gathered in the research do not have to become present as representations. They become conditions for another body to enter the proposition.


    Perhaps this is the force of the permeable chamber:
    It does not ask another body to enter.
    It makes another body curious about entering.
    Curiosity becomes a form of spatial bodying.


    The withdrawn ceramic remains materially persistent, but its allure keeps the proposition moving. It offers an encounter without exhausting it, an interior without fully revealing its interiority, a body that can be approached without becoming completely available. Vicarious touching becomes the spatial generosity of the withdrawn body: a room made through allure for the curiosity of other bodies.


    Persistent Becoming.


    The movement from Woodman to clay to ceramic is therefore not a passage from image to object. It is a passage between persistent bodies.
    The photographic body enters the reading body. The reading body carries its sounding into clay. Clay gathers, transforms and materialises the correspondence. Firing withdraws this gathering into ceramic. The ceramic then enters another spatial situation, where another body encounters it.
    Across these transformations, the original correspondence is neither preserved nor lost. It becomes a persistent possibility for further touching.


    Vicarious touching enables the body to persist without remaining present.


    What surfaces is never the whole correspondence. What withdraws is not lost. Both remain active within the persistent body, available to another encounter.


    The ceramic becomes materially durable while its force~form remains propositionally open. Its interiority persists as a permeable condition of correspondence: a gathering that can continue to weather, withdraw, surface and become otherwise.
    Persistent becoming is not the persistence of what a body was. It is the persistence of its capacity to enter another relation.


    And perhaps this is where In~Touching finds another spatial condition: the ceramic does not need to touch another body directly. It creates the conditions in which another body might become responsive, attentive and curious—and therefore already, somehow, in correspondence.
    Vicarious touching ~ persistent becoming.


    A body of allure.
    A permeable interiority.
    A room for the curiosity of other bodies.

  • The Withdrawn Ceramic Body ~ Research in Futurity


    Towards an Elaborative Spatial Practice

    Reading Apparatus.

    The ceramic bodies have not arrived to resolve these earlier questions. They have arrived as another access point.

    Earlier spatial propositions remain here as bodies: architectural, photographic, textual, remembered, imagined, lived. They gather without becoming one another.

    Clay offers another kind of hospitality. It allows these bodies to enter a material correspondence without requiring their differences to disappear. A place can become a surface. An image can become a trace. A question can become an aperture. A remembered interior can become a chamber.

    The ceramic body gathers, but does not contain.

    Firing withdraws the body from the provisionality of clay, yet the correspondence continues. What has been gathered becomes materially persistent without becoming resolved.

    The withdrawn ceramic body therefore becomes another access point into the research: not an ending, but a body through which earlier propositions might encounter something not yet known.

    What happens when unfinished research acquires another body?

    For Moreton, the withdrawn ceramic body is not where the research ends. It is where the research acquires another capacity for futurity.

    Moreton’s spatial practice has developed through an extended gathering of bodies: architectural, material, photographic, textual, remembered, imagined and lived. These bodies have emerged through different situations and periods of working, including interiority, landscape, drawing, walking, architectural research, teaching, image-making, reading and the exploratory use of clay. They do not form a linear research history. Rather, they remain as propositions capable of returning, entering new relations and becoming otherwise.

    The practice therefore begins not from a singular question requiring resolution, but from a multiplicity of questions that remain active through making. Earlier speculative spatial practices are not treated as completed stages through which the ceramic practice has subsequently progressed. They remain research bodies. Their propositions continue to have a capacity for encounter.

    The ceramic bodies have not arrived to resolve these earlier questions. They have arrived as another access point.

    This access point is significant because clay introduces a particular material condition through which multiplicity can gather. The recent work with clay allows architectural propositions, spatial memories, images, readings, bodily experiences, surfaces, apertures and material encounters to enter the same field without requiring them to become equivalent. Clay does not reconcile their differences. It provides a hospitable condition in which their differences can remain active.

    This hospitality is important to Moreton’s developing spatial practice. It is not hospitality as an invitation into a predetermined interior. It is a more unstable form of hosting in which the host itself is changed by what it receives. Clay receives pressure, touch, resistance, gesture, force, moisture, gravity and time, but it does not simply register these things passively. It transforms them. The material becomes an active correspondent within the making.

    The clay body therefore becomes a meeting place for other bodies.

    The architectural body can enter it through proportion, enclosure, aperture, threshold and spatial memory. The photographic body can enter through trace, viewpoint, absence and the persistence of an earlier encounter. The textual body can enter through propositions, questions and speculative language. The remembered body can enter without being represented. Landscape can enter through weather, erosion, surface and movement. Other theoretical and artistic bodies can enter as correspondents rather than authorities.

    None of these bodies needs to be reduced to the ceramic.

    They remain themselves.

    This is where Moreton’s spatial practice begins to move towards a practice of correspondence. The ceramic body does not become a container for research. It becomes a material condition through which different research bodies can encounter one another.

    Multiplicity becomes correspondence.

    The distinction is important. Multiplicity describes the presence of many bodies; correspondence describes what becomes possible between them. The ceramic does not gather in order to produce unity. It gathers in order to produce relation.

    This also changes the understanding of the ceramic object. The fired ceramic is materially withdrawn from the provisionality of clay, but this withdrawal should not be understood as closure. Firing changes the condition of the material. What was soft, responsive and unstable becomes persistent. The provisional relations of making become materially carried forward into another state.

    Pressure becomes surface.

    Resistance becomes form.

    Aperture becomes interior.

    Gesture becomes trace.

    Fire becomes transformation.

    Ceramic becomes persistence.

    Yet what persists is not simply the object.

    Something of the correspondence persists with it.

    The withdrawn ceramic body therefore occupies an unusual position within the spatial practice. It is withdrawn from the immediate event of making, but not withdrawn from relation. It carries the consequences of previous encounters into situations that have not yet happened. Its persistence makes another encounter possible.

    This is where futurity enters.

    Futurity, within Moreton’s practice, is not the prediction of what the ceramic will become. Nor is it an image of an imagined future. It is the capacity of a materially persistent body to enter another relation.

    The ceramic waits.

    It waits for architecture, for light, for another body, for proximity, for movement, for an altered viewpoint, for memory, for an encounter that cannot yet be known.

    The future therefore exists not as a destination but as an interval of possibility.

    This understanding also extends Moreton’s distinction between in~place and in~play. A spatial proposition cannot simply be transferred intact from one situation to another. Its physical components may persist, but its spatial proposition emerges through changing relations between architecture, ceramic, bodies, light, proximity, movement and atmosphere. The work remains spatially active when these relations remain capable of being re-entered.

    The ceramic body consequently becomes a form of spatial persistence without becoming a fixed spatial meaning.

    The same ceramic body can become another spatial body.

    The same architectural body can produce another spatial proposition.

    The same research body can enter another material condition.

    This is why earlier exploratory research can remain relevant without being retrospectively converted into a predetermined origin story. The Waverley project, interiority research, architectural investigations, drawing, photography, landscape, teaching and reading do not need to be explained as steps towards ceramics. They remain active bodies whose propositions can now be furthered through clay.

    The ceramic does not rewrite them.

    It gives them another access point.

    This access point also makes possible a different understanding of the archive. Rather than preserving research as a chronology of completed ideas, Moreton’s archive becomes a field of potential correspondence. Earlier texts, images and projects can encounter later ceramic bodies, while later making can return to earlier propositions without needing to reproduce them.

    The archive becomes anarchive.

    What was once speculative can become material.

    What was once architectural can become corporeal.

    What was once an image can become a spatial interval.

    What was once a question can become an aperture.

    What was once unfinished can remain unfinished, but acquire another body through which to continue.

    This is not a movement from immaterial thought towards material resolution. It is a continuing movement between bodies.

    Here, making becomes a form of spatial thinking. Clay does not illustrate an idea already formed elsewhere. The material encounter produces further thought. Resistance changes the proposition. The hand changes the surface. The surface changes the perception of the body. The body changes the spatial proposition. Fire changes the material condition. The fired body then enters another spatial situation.

    The process is therefore recursive rather than sequential:

    gathering ~ making ~ correspondence ~ withdrawal ~ encounter ~ futurity ~ gathering again

    Within this movement, the ceramic body becomes neither object nor conclusion. It becomes a withdrawn spatial~practising body: materially persistent, relationally open and capable of carrying multiple research bodies into future encounters.

    The body withdraws.

    The correspondence continues.

    The research remains~in~play.

    And perhaps this is the deeper proposition of Moreton’s spatial practice: that making does not necessarily produce knowledge by resolving what is unknown. It can produce the conditions through which the unknown remains capable of becoming something else.

    The withdrawn ceramic body is therefore not where the research ends.

    It is where the research acquires another capacity for futurity.

    The ceramic persists, but it does not close.

    The earlier bodies remain different.

    The spatial propositions remain open.

    And what has been gathered is never simply contained.

    It reverberates.

  • Bodies Concerning : Building~Making~ Propositional~Research Art Based Practices

    Bodies Concerning~

    Concerning contains an ambiguity, that allows the post to operate as more than an annotated bibliography, rather it is a body gathering correspondent bodies whose ideas remain available to be materially furthered.

    What kinds of bodies gather around making?

    A drawing enters architecture. Architecture enters material practice. The potter’s wheel becomes a site of cognition. The vessel opens a question about interior and exterior. Objects gather environments; environments become active within the making of things.

    These texts and references gather around propositions rather than a single discipline. They approach building as more than construction, drawing as more than representation, and material as more than the substance from which an object is formed.

    Each introduces another body of thought into the field: another way of sensing, building, imagining, making or inhabiting.

    The references remain distinct, but their propositions can enter correspondence. A theory of material agency encounters a ceramic body. An architectural drawing becomes available to the movement of clay. A vessel becomes a proposition about interiority. The act of making begins to participate in the production of thought.

    Perhaps this is where art-based practice becomes spatial: not simply by occupying architecture, but by allowing different bodies of knowledge, material and experience to build~~make relations that did not previously exist.

    These earlier enquiries remain unfinished, available to be encountered again through the clay, the studio and the withdrawn ceramic body.

    The ceramic becomes materially persistent, while the proposition remains~in~play.

    What other bodies of thought might now gather through making?

     

    Essays on The Blurring of Art and Life, Allan Kaprow
    Kaprow_Allan_Essays_on_the_Blurring_of_Art_and_Life_with_Impurity_Experimental_Art_The_Meaning_of_Life_missing.pdf

    Architectural Inquiry :  Building The Drawing

    The drawing as analogue allows more subtle relations, of technique, material and process, to develop between drawing and building.

    Immaterial Architecture
    The Illegal Architect
    Jonathan Hill

    Oak Tree
    Oil
    Paper
    Plaster
    Rust
    Sgratfito
    Silence
    Sound
    Steel
    Television
    Weather

    Frosted Light
    Index of immaterial architectures

    TRANSPARENCY : LITERAL AND PHENOMENAL
    Colin Rowe, Robert Slutzky

    Interactions of the Abstract Body
    Josiah McElheny

    Object Lesson
    Interactive Abstract  Body (Square)
    The Spatial Body (After Fontana)

    Tracing Eisenman
    Stan Allen
    Indexical Characters

    FABRIC=MASS+ FORM
    Alan Chandler
    The interest in fabric formwork is in its deployment in a building process, which is faster than conventional formwork. Fabric formwork is inherently more sustainable due to the minimising of both concrete and shuttering, and more radically, allows the constructor to intervene in the process of casting even as the cast is taking place.

    ANTI OBJECT
    Kengo Kuma
    We are composed of matter and live in the midst of matter. Our objective should not be to  renounce matter, but to search for a form of matter other than objects.
    What that form is called- ARCHITECTURE, GARDENS< TECHNOLOGY is not important.

    ReThinking Matereriality
    The engagement of mind with the material world
    Elizabeth DeMarrais, Chris Gosden, Colin Renfrew

    The Affordances of Things
    Towards a  Theory of Material Engagement
    Aesthetics, Intelligence and Emotions
    Relationality of Mind and Matter

    Material Agency
    Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach
    Carl Knappett, Lambros Malafouris

    At The Potter’s Wheel : An Argument for Material Agency
    We should replace our view of cognition as residing inside the potter’s head, with that of cognition enacted at the potter’s wheel.

    The Neglected Networks of Material Agency : Artefacts, Pictures and Texts

    Material Agency as Cognitive Scaffolding

    The Cognitive Life of Things
    Material Engagement and the Extended Mind
    Lambros Malafouris, Colin Renfrew

    Minds, Things and Materiality
    Michael Wheeler

    Communities of Things and Objects : A Spatial Perspective
    Carl Knappett

    Imagining the Cognitive Life of Things
    Edwin Hutchins

    Things and Their Embodied Environments
    Architectures for Perception
    Structuring Perception through Material Artifacts
    Charles Goodwin

    Leach Pottery, Studio and Museum
    A Potter’s Book
    Bernard Leach

    Adventures of the Fire, Vessels Through Time
    Ceramic Pavilion
    People make space, and space contains people
    Ceramic space and life

    Gordon Baldwin
    Objects For A Landscape
    David Whiting
    Vessels-Spaces that cannot be drawn, rather they  need to be experienced.
    Imagining a Vessel in a Rock on a Beach, 2006,(charcoal on paper)

    The Architecture of The Ceramic Vessel
    The use of the vessel in the investigation of our world.
    The exploration through the dichotomy of the analysis between exterior and interior, of one pot to another and from  the message they convey.

    MATERIAL MATTERS
    ARCHITECTURE
    AND MATERIAL PRACTICE
    Katie Lloyd Thomas

    PLENUMS : RETHINKING MATTER, GEOMETRY AND SUBJECTIVITY
    Peg Rawes

    ARCHITECTURE
    IN THE AGE  OF DIVIDED REPRESENTATION
    The Question of Creativity in the Shadow of Production
    Dalibor Vesely
    The Nature of Communicative Space
    Creativity in the Shadow of Modern Technology
    The Rehabilitation of Fragment
    Towards a Poetics of Architecture

    The Projective Cast
    Architecture and its Three Geometries
    Robin Evans
    Architects do not produce geometry, they consume it

    Analysing ARCHITECTURE
    Simon Unwin
    Geometries of Being
    Architecture as Making Frames
    Space and Structure

    spatial practice, propositional research, art-based practice, correspondence, material agency, material thinking, drawing, architecture, ceramic bodies, research bodies, spatial propositions, building~making.

    Original Source: Into Beautiful Privacy : The Blurring of Art and Life

  • Atmospheres and Spatial Intercessors~The Entangled Body(ing)~Threshold~Gathering

    Reading Apparatus.

    Bodies gather differently in each image.

    Ceramic surfaces turn, separate, approach and withdraw. Apertures open towards other bodies and towards the spaces around them. Architectural intervals become active: sometimes holding a body apart, sometimes drawing bodies into proximity, sometimes making room for a body that is absent, remembered or imagined.

    The images therefore do not simply document ceramic objects. They hold particular spatial encounters in suspension.

    A change of viewpoint produces another proposition. A change of distance produces another relation. Surface, light, architecture and proximity begin to participate with the ceramic body, allowing the spatial to emerge between things rather than reside within them.

    What remains across these changing arrangements is not an identical installation, but the possibility of correspondence.

    The ceramic body persists.
    The spatial body changes.

    What kind of relation can remain in play when the bodies, the architecture and the viewpoint change?

    Body → Threshold → Gathering → Body

    A body becomes spatial through what passes between bodies.

    Perhaps the ceramic does not carry a spatial proposition from one place to another. Perhaps it carries the capacity for another encounter. A surface, an aperture, an interval, a photograph, a remembered body, a change of light: each can alter what the work becomes.

    Here, in~place begins to loosen into in~play. The spatial proposition is no longer something held by the object, or secured by intention, but something that must remain active between bodies.

    What remains is not sameness but correspondence.

    The ceramic persists.

    The architecture changes.

    The bodies remain different.

    Something remains open.

    And perhaps this is where a spatial practice begins to touch futurity: not in knowing what the work will become, but in keeping open the conditions through which it might become something else.

    Force~~Feeling~Spatial~Temporal~Notation~Interiorities

    Body ~ Threshold ~ Gathering

    Within this spatial practice, Body ~ Threshold ~ Gathering can therefore be understood not as three categories but as three mutually implicated conditions.

    Body identifies the material and corporeal presence through which spatial relations become perceptible.

    Threshold identifies the interval through which bodies encounter, affect and become perceptible to one another.

    Gathering identifies the accumulation and continuation of those encounters: traces, memories, surfaces, images, places, forces and other bodies entering into provisional correspondence.

    Two bodies.
    An interval.

    Surface turns towards surface. An aperture opens. Another body remains just beyond what can be seen.

    The architecture does not disappear behind the ceramic. It enters the arrangement: wall, floor, distance, light, viewpoint, proximity.

    The image holds the encounter long enough for these relations to become perceptible.

    Perhaps this is where the spatial proposition begins — not in the ceramic alone, but in what gathers between bodies.

    The same body can turn towards another space.
    The same architecture can produce another encounter.
    The photograph can carry the trace of one proposition towards another.

    What remains in play when the arrangement changes?

    The terms bleed into one another.

    Body becomes threshold.

    Threshold becomes gathering.

    Gathering becomes another body.

    Relations in~play~

    ceramic → architecture → bodies → proposition → correspondence → In~~Touching → futurity

    This is a form of corporeality in which force~feelings move through encounters and exchanges with and between bodies.

    Clay becomes particularly significant because it does not simply receive these forces. It participates in their transformation.

    Pressure becomes surface.

    Resistance becomes form.

    Aperture becomes interior.

    Fire becomes transformation.

    Ceramic becomes persistence.

    The spatial proposition therefore does not sit outside the material process. It emerges through it.

    Relations Remaining in Play

    An Attentiveness within the Spatial Practice of Russell Moreton

    Russell Moreton’s spatial practice increasingly attends to relations that remain in~play.

    This attentiveness begins with a distinction between the physical persistence of a work and the persistence of the spatial proposition through which that work becomes active. A ceramic body may remain materially unchanged while its spatial proposition alters significantly according to the architecture, orientation, proximity, viewpoint, atmosphere and bodies through which it is encountered.

    The work therefore cannot be understood solely through its material identity.

    A ceramic body is one condition.

    Its spatial proposition is another.

    The two remain related, but they are not equivalent.

    Same ceramic body does not necessarily mean the same spatial body.

    This distinction becomes particularly important when a work moves between sites. A work initially developed and documented within a particular architectural situation may contain a complex set of relations: its position within the architecture, the distance between bodies, the direction from which it is approached, the interval it produces, the light surrounding it, the scale of the room, and the movements of those encountering it.

    These relations are not simply supplementary to the work.

    They are part of what makes the work spatial.

    In~place / In~play

    Moreton’s practice consequently distinguishes between a proposition being in~place and being in~play.

    To be in~place might suggest that a spatial proposition can be transferred from one situation to another while remaining essentially intact. To be in~play suggests something more active: the proposition must continue to be enacted through relations.

    The spatial proposition is therefore not a fixed meaning attached to an object.

    It is a condition that becomes perceptible through encounter.

    Architecture changes it.

    Bodies change it.

    Viewpoints change it.

    Light changes it.

    Proximity changes it.

    Memory changes it.

    The work changes as these relations change.

    Spatial Intercessors~Other Bodies : Spaces for Francesca (Woodman).

    This does not mean that every new installation produces an entirely different work. Rather, it recognises that the spatial dimension of the work is relationally contingent.

    The ceramic persists.

    The proposition is reactivated.

    Or it may not be.

    This distinction creates an important attentiveness within Moreton’s practice: what relations need to remain active for a spatial proposition to remain in~play?

    From Intention to Relation

    This attentiveness also shifts the practice away from understanding artistic intention as the primary carrier of meaning.

    A curator, viewer or writer may interpret, describe or paraphrase what a work appears to propose. Such language can be valuable, but it does not necessarily reproduce the spatial relations through which the proposition originally became perceptible.

    An intention can be described.

    A relation has to be enacted.

    A feeling can be named.

    The conditions through which that feeling emerges have to remain available.

    This is where Moreton’s developing vocabulary of force~feelings becomes significant.

    Force is not treated as an abstract property imposed upon material. It becomes perceptible through pressure, resistance, proximity, movement, weight, touch, withdrawal and exchange.

    Feeling emerges through these relations.

    The spatial proposition therefore resides neither entirely in the object nor entirely in the intention of the maker.

    It emerges between bodies.

    The Photograph as Spatial Evidence

    Within this practice, photographic documentation can consequently have a role beyond conventional recording.

    A photograph of a work situated within a particular architectural environment may preserve aspects of the spatial proposition that a verbal description cannot.

    It can gather:

    the ceramic body’s orientation;

    its relationship to architecture;

    the interval between bodies;

    the implied position of the viewer;

    light and atmosphere;

    scale;

    proximity and distance;

    concealment and revelation.

    The photograph becomes evidence of a proposition in~play.

    It does not replace the spatial encounter, but it can carry something of its relational configuration forward.

    This gives the photograph an anarchive-like function within the practice. It does not simply preserve what happened. It becomes a material from which another proposition might later be re-entered, reconsidered or re-enacted.

    The image therefore becomes another body in correspondence with the ceramic.

    Re-enactment Rather Than Replication.

    A spatial proposition cannot necessarily be reproduced by replicating the object’s position alone.

    Nor can it necessarily be transferred through explanatory text.

    What is required is a re-enactment of relations.

    Re-enactment here does not mean theatrical reconstruction. It means attending to the conditions through which the work becomes spatially active again.

    The question becomes:

    What needs to happen between the bodies for the proposition to come into play?

    This might involve orientation, interval, scale, light, proximity, architecture or movement.

    It might also involve allowing the new site to alter the proposition rather than attempting to reproduce the previous situation exactly.

    This is important because Moreton’s spatial practice is not concerned with preserving a single ideal installation.

    It is concerned with maintaining the capacity for correspondence.

    The new site should therefore not simply receive the work.

    It should enter into relation with it.

    The Same Body, Another Proposition(ing)

    This understanding has become particularly visible through Moreton’s recent arrangements of ceramic bodies.

    Spatial Intercessors~Other Bodies : Spaces for Francesca (Woodman) and The Tentative Trace ~ From Living Body to Ceramic Body originate through relations with the same architectural body, yet different viewpoints and arrangements produce different spatial propositions.

    The ceramic bodies remain materially related.

    The architectural environment remains continuous.

    Yet the spatial situation changes.

    In one arrangement, separation and orientation produce an interval through which another body—remembered, imagined or withdrawn—can become perceptible.

    In another, proximity, surface, aperture and trace produce a more intimate correspondence between living body, image, architecture and ceramic.

    The distinction demonstrates that:

    The same architectural body can become many spatial propositions through different bodily encounters.

    And equally:

    The same ceramic body can become many spatial bodies through changes in relation.

    This is not a problem to resolve.

    It is a condition to attend to.

    The Ceramic as Spatial Intercessor

    The ceramic therefore operates as more than an object placed within architecture.

    It can become a spatial intercessor.

    It may make an interval perceptible.

    It may draw attention towards an overlooked surface.

    It may produce a threshold.

    It may gather bodies.

    It may establish a chamber without enclosing one.

    It may make another architecture perceptible within an existing architectural body.

    The ceramic does not simply occupy architecture. It makes another architecture perceptible.

    This proposition is central to Moreton’s emerging spatial practice.

    The “another” is important.

    It does not describe a replacement architecture.

    It describes a difference that becomes perceptible through the encounter between existing architecture, ceramic, bodies and atmosphere.

    Body ~ Threshold ~ Gathering

    This is also where The Entangled Body ~ Threshold ~ Gathering becomes more than a descriptor for a group of works.

    It becomes a way of attending to relational activity.

    Body is the material and corporeal presence through which encounter begins.

    Threshold is the interval in which relations become active.

    Gathering is the accumulation and continuation of those relations.

    The terms bleed into one another.

    Body becomes threshold.

    Threshold becomes gathering.

    Gathering becomes another body.

    This produces a corporeality of clay in which force~feelings move through encounters and exchanges with other bodies.

    The ceramic body is consequently not simply a finished material entity.

    It is a body that continues to participate.

    Relations That Remain.

    The attentiveness to relations that remain in~play is therefore not an additional methodology imposed upon Moreton’s practice.

    It is becoming a condition of the practice itself.

    The work asks not simply:

    What is this object?

    but:

    What relations does this body make possible?

    Not:

    What did the artist intend?

    but:

    What becomes perceptible through the encounter?

    Not:

    Can the work be transferred unchanged?

    but:

    What must remain in play for its spatial proposition to continue?

    These questions keep the practice open.

    They also create a particular understanding of futurity.

    The future of the work does not lie in predicting its next form.

    It lies in its capacity to enter another relation.

    The ceramic persists.

    The architecture changes.

    The bodies move.

    The proposition is reactivated.

    Something else becomes possible.

    A Practice of Correspondence

    Moreton’s spatial practice can therefore be understood increasingly as a practice of correspondence.

    Bodies remain distinct.

    Relations remain active.

    Differences are not resolved.

    The work is not required to arrive at a final spatial meaning.

    Instead, the practice attends to what happens when bodies, materials, architectures, images, memories and ideas remain sufficiently open to affect one another.

    This is the condition of In~~Touching.

    Touch does not require literal contact.

    A body can touch through an interval.

    An image can touch a ceramic.

    Architecture can touch a memory.

    Language can touch material.

    Francesca Woodman, Blueprint for a Temple (II), 1980. Collage of diazotype elements and gelatin silver prints. Gagosian, New York, 2024; via Woodman Family Foundation.

    Klein Blue Yves Klein.

    Donna Huanca. Surrogate Painteen @ Peres Projects, Berlin

    Chris Marker/J. G. Ballard

    Formal Brilliance/Philosophical Complexity. La Jette

    A previous installation can touch a future one.

    A spatial proposition can survive not by remaining identical, but by remaining capable of being re-entered.

    The work therefore becomes a body waiting~in~correspondence.

    Its material persistence does not close it.

    Its spatial proposition remains in~play.

    And this may be one of the central attentivenesses of Moreton’s developing spatial practice:

    To remain attentive to the relations through which a body becomes spatial, and to the conditions through which those relations can continue to move.

    The ceramic remains.

    The architecture remains.

    The bodies remain different.

    The proposition remains open.

    In~place becomes in~play.

    And what remains in play can continue to reverberate.

    A spatial practice does not preserve a relation by keeping it unchanged. It preserves its possibility by keeping the relation in play.

    Keywords 

    Body~Threshold~Gathering, ceramic bodies, spatial practice, spatial bodies, spatial intercessors, body~space, threshold, gathering, correspondence, in~place / in~play, spatial proposition, relations in play, material encounter, force~feelings, interiority, permeability, aperture, atmosphere, photographic evidence, re-enactment, futurity, In~~Touching

  • Spatial Bodies : From Trace to Hosting Permeability.

    Spatial Body Proposition : Body-as-site → body-as-host → hosting permeability

    Permeability allows passage.
    Hosting allows correspondence.

    Panspermia begins with a body that cannot quite contain what passes through it. Cyanotype, botanical trace, hand-drawn line and celestial mapping gather upon the same fragile surface, each carrying a different temporality. The body becomes a host rather than a boundary: something is deposited, something seeps, something remains, something exceeds. Read through the present practice, the work begins to open onto permeability—the body as a threshold through which other bodies and traces can pass. What appears as an image of finality becomes, instead, a strangely persistent field of correspondence.

    The trace begins as an indication of a body, but gradually becomes something else: a spatial body in its own right. Cyanotype, drawn mark, mapped surface and atmospheric residue gather until the figure can no longer be understood simply as an outline. The body begins to host what exceeds it.

    What happens when a trace becomes capable of hosting other bodies?

    The cyanotype does not merely register contact. It spreads, absorbs, pools and occupies. The surface becomes a field of movement in which body, image, material and atmosphere enter correspondence.

    Perhaps permeability is not simply the capacity to let something through. Could it also be a capacity to receive what arrives?

    The body becomes less a boundary than a threshold. It gathers without entirely containing. It allows other matter(s) to become perceptible without reducing their difference. Trace becomes atmosphere; atmosphere becomes spatial relation.

    Body-as-site begins to become body-as-host.

    In the circular body, the boundary becomes particularly ambiguous. The marked perimeter establishes an enclosure while simultaneously opening onto an interior that seems to continue beyond the image. The drawn marks within it do not simply describe an interior; they activate it. The surface begins to feel like a chamber without walls.

    Could the chamber begin before enclosure?

    Could it emerge through the correspondence of bodies, surfaces, traces, pressures and atmospheres?

    The spatial body is therefore not simply something represented within an image. It is produced through the relations gathered across the surface.

    Trace → body → host → atmosphere → permeability.

    What begins as an index of presence becomes a proposition for encounter: a body capable of receiving, carrying and transforming what comes into contact with it.

    The spatial body does not contain its correspondences.

    It hosts them.

    What else might this body become capable of hosting?

    Looking at Panspermia (2010) again alongside the recent work on Gathering Towards A Futurity through Clay, The Ceramic Body…Permeable Chamber, the frottages and In~~Touching, I think the original text contains something that is now much more important than it appeared at the time.

    The work was initially described as a body containing traces, mappings and meanings. I think we can now see it differently: the body is itself a permeable host, a threshold through which different material and temporal bodies pass. The cyanotype does not simply occupy the drawn body; it exceeds it. The astronomical map does not simply describe the body; it passes through it. The date fixes the body while the cyanotype, botanical trace and celestial markings undo that fixity.

    So I would retain much of the original thinking, but allow the vocabulary of trace, seepage, correspondence, permeability, host body, absent presence and futurity to become more active.

    Panspermia : revised text 2026.


    THE PHYSICAL
    THE EMOTIONAL
    THE CONCEPTUAL

    First Intention (noun, medicine): the healing of a wound through the natural contact and joining of the parts involved.

    Fecundity. Fertility. Creativity. Inventiveness. Fruitfulness. Productiveness.

    What response within one’s subjectivity creates the desire—and perhaps the necessity—for something to become embodied, to be brought into the realm of things?

    CREATIVE POST-MORTEM — 19.08.2010

    A life-size outline of a female body is drawn onto lightweight Chinese paper, positioned as if making passage through a fluid. The body is tensioned: arms extended and joined above the head, feet together, suspended between propulsion and descent. It seems caught within a moment that cannot quite decide whether it is moving forwards or sinking backwards.

    The drawn body becomes a host for other matter(s).

    Parts of the figure are occupied by the blue photographic material of cyanotype. Seed heads placed directly against the paper leave floral impressions through contact, displacement and exposure. The botanical traces do not simply fill the body. They interrupt it.

    The cyanotype seeps.

    Its fluidity encounters the absorbency of the paper and begins to exceed the territory established by the drawn trace. The boundary of the body therefore becomes unstable. What appears at first to be an outline becomes a permeable threshold through which another material body enters, spreads and withdraws.

    Within the traced figure are areas untouched by the cyanotype. These apparently barren spaces become strangely active. They are not simply absences or empty ground, but intervals within which different temporalities remain perceptible. The cyanotype records an event of exposure and contact, while the drawn line appears to hold another kind of persistence.

    Two registrations occupy the same surface.

    One flows.
    One fixes.
    Neither completely contains the other.

    The residues of the cyanotype gather into channels and collect towards a reservoir at the foot of the figure. Against this movement, the black marker line establishes a temporary permanence. Two backslashes interrupt the trace, marking the apparent closure of the performance, followed by the precise date: 19.08.2010.

    The date appears almost forensic. It might recall the labelling of a mortuary body, fixing a moment after which the body can only remain as trace. Yet this fixing is immediately troubled by everything that continues to move across and through it.

    The body is absent and present at once.

    It survives as an index.

    The astronomical markings intensify this condition. Visible only within the territory of the body, and apparently inscribed from the reverse side of the paper, they resemble tattoos, diagrams or another form of writing upon the body. They introduce a cartography that does not originate with the body itself.

    The body becomes a host.

    It carries information that exceeds its own authorship, its own duration and perhaps its own comprehension. The celestial markings pass through the traced figure as another body of knowledge, another temporality, another way of locating existence.

    The human body is therefore no longer simply the subject of the image. It becomes a site of correspondence.

    Terrestrial trace meets celestial mapping.
    Botanical matter meets photographic chemistry.
    Hand-drawn line meets fluid movement.
    Presence meets absence.
    Body meets cosmos.

    The astronomical marks seem to extend the body beyond itself. They locate it within another field of relations, where the temporality of the individual body is only one duration among many.

    This is where the title Panspermia begins to become significant.

    Rather than suggesting a simple transmission of life, the work can be approached as a proposition about the movement of matter, traces and possibilities between bodies. Something is carried. Something is deposited. Something exceeds its host. Something remains after the body that carried it has withdrawn.

    The cyanotype is particularly important here because its movement is not entirely controllable. It registers contact, but also produces its own trajectory through the material conditions of paper, fluidity, absorption and drying. The botanical trace is therefore neither wholly imposed nor wholly received.

    It is a correspondence.

    The work’s fecundity lies within this instability.

    What appears to be a fragile body becomes a field through which other bodies can pass.

    The inherent finality of the human condition is therefore not simply measured and mapped. It is troubled by the persistence of other matter(s). The body may be finite, but the traces moving through it are not necessarily contained by that finitude.

    The work resembles a shroud, but perhaps it is also an aperture.

    A body marked by what has passed through it.

    A surface carrying what it cannot entirely contain.

    A host whose identity is continually altered by its correspondences.

    The body becomes less a boundary than a permeable chamber: a temporary spatial condition where traces, materials, memories, mappings and temporalities gather without becoming one thing.

    What is gathered is never simply contained.

    It reverberates.

    In Panspermia, the body is a host for traces. Here, the trace seems to have become increasingly spatialised. The cyanotype is no longer simply marking a body; it produces a field through which the body, diagram, atmosphere and surrounding space become difficult to separate. The circular image especially feels less like an image of an enclosed body than a spatial body with an active threshold.

    A body appears, but it does not remain entirely its own. Botanical traces, photographic fluids, celestial markings and the drawn line gather across its fragile surface. The cyanotype seeps beyond the territory of the figure, while the astronomical markings seem to pass through it from another side. The body becomes a host for other bodies.

    What happens when a boundary begins to host what exceeds it?

    The question is not simply where the body ends, but what begins to happen when other matter(s) enter, pass through and alter its territory. The body becomes atmospheric: not an enclosure, but an immersive condition of correspondence.

    Can an atmosphere be produced through the correspondence of bodies rather than exist around them?

    Here, trace becomes more than registration. It becomes a movement between bodies—seed, paper, light, fluid, hand, image, celestial map, memory. Each leaves something behind while carrying something elsewhere.

    The host does not simply contain. It is changed by what it hosts.

    The figure is therefore neither wholly present nor absent. Its outline fixes a body even as the materials moving through it undo that fixity. What appears as a final marking becomes another opening.

    Body-as-site becomes body-as-host.

    And perhaps the host becomes something stranger still: an immersive atmosphere of corresponding bodies, a temporary spatialisation in which nothing is quite contained by the thing that carries it.

    What is gathered is never simply contained. It reverberates.

    body → trace → seepage → host → atmosphere → correspondence → question → opening → futurity

    Why I think this is a significant re-entry into the work

    There are three shifts here that seem particularly important to the current practice.

    1. From body-as-site → body-as-host

    The original ending says:

    “the body as a site.”

    That remains useful, but the current work has moved further. The body is not simply a site upon which things are mapped. It hosts relations that alter it.

    That connects directly to your present proposition:

    The Ceramic Body is an actively Attentively~Troubling Permeable Chamber.

    The Panspermia body is an early version of this proposition, although it is not yet ceramic.

    1. From trace-as-record → trace-as-active body

    The cyanotype is not merely evidence of what happened. It has its own material agency. It seeps, accumulates, leaves residues and exceeds the drawn boundary.

    That makes the work surprisingly close to your present understanding of clay troubling the gathering.

    The seed head touches paper → the cyanotype registers contact → the fluid moves → the boundary is exceeded.

    The later trajectory becomes:

    frottage → collage → clay → firing → ceramic

    Each stage asks what happens when one body encounters another.

    1. From finality → futurity

    The original text is strongly concerned with mortality and the finality of the human body. I would not remove that. But I would allow another possibility to emerge alongside it.

    The body is dated and apparently fixed.

    Yet the material traces continue.

    The astronomical markings exceed the body.

    The botanical traces exceed the outline.

    The cyanotype exceeds its intended territory.

    So the work contains a small contradiction:

    The body is finite, but what passes through the body may continue.

    That is where I think futurity can enter the 2010 work without imposing the current practice upon it.

    The work doesn’t need to be retrospectively declared a work about futurity. Rather, the current practice has discovered a futurity that was already latent in its material behaviour.

    And that is exactly the kind of anarchival correspondence I think you are now looking for: not correcting the old work, but allowing it to become capable of touching the present.

  • Gathering Towards A Futurity through Clay : Collage Workings to Ceramic Bodies

    This image brings futurity into the spatial script in a particularly tangible way. I think it also changes the movement we have been describing: the collage is no longer only gathering what has been read or encountered. It is constructing propositions for something that has not yet become.

    On a Futurity through Clay

    The collage gathers what has been encountered, but does not leave it there. Fragments, traces, drawings, surfaces, spatial memories and material residues are brought into proximity as propositions for something not yet formed.

    These are constructs~transports: provisional spatial bodies through which matter(s) can move, overlap and become otherwise. The collage does not describe the ceramic body to come. It troubles the conditions from which another body might emerge.

    Clay enters this futurity as a responsive material. What has gathered through reading, touching and wayfaring is neither transferred nor reproduced. It is resisted, absorbed, displaced and transformed through making.

    collage~clay~trouble~fire~ceramic~

    The movement is not towards a predetermined form. It is towards the possibility of correspondence.

    The ceramic body therefore arrives carrying something of what preceded it, but also something that could not have been known beforehand.

    Futurity is not what comes after.
    It is already moving through the material.

    The collage gathers readings, traces, images, spatial memories, gestures and material residues into provisional proximity. These matter(s) are not assembled towards resolution, but held within a hospitality of difference where their forces can touch, interfere and become otherwise. Clay enters this gathering as another body. It is troubled by what has gathered, but does not simply receive it. It resists, absorbs, displaces and transforms. The speculative proposition moves from collage into clay, where reading becomes pressure, trace becomes surface, spatial memory becomes interior, and difference becomes permeability. What emerges is a ceramic body carrying the gathering towards an unknowable futurity.

    “Gathering Towards A Futurity through Clay” makes the movement more explicit while retaining the provisionality we have been developing.

    It suggests that the collage is neither an archive of what has happened nor a design for what will happen. It is a gathering towards: a material and spatial condition in which something may emerge.

    Gathering Towards A Futurity through Clay
    Collage Workings to Ceramic Bodies

    The collage gathers readings, traces, images, spatial memories, gestures and material residues into provisional proximity. These matter(s) are not assembled towards resolution, but held within a hospitality of difference where their forces can touch, interfere and become otherwise.

    The collage becomes a construct~transport: a spatial body through which what has been encountered can move towards what has not yet become.

    Clay enters this gathering as another body.

    It is troubled by what has gathered, but does not simply receive it. It resists, absorbs, displaces and transforms. The speculative proposition moves from collage into clay, where reading becomes pressure, trace becomes surface, spatial memory becomes interior, and difference becomes permeability.

    Collageclaytroublefireceramic.

    What emerges is not a translation of the collage into form, but a ceramic body carrying something of the gathering into another material condition.

    Futurity is already moving through the clay.

    The fired ceramic becomes a body of what has been gathered and what remains unknowable: a permeable chamber, spatialised and waitingincorrespondence for other bodies to encountertouchwith.

    I particularly like “Collage Workings to Ceramic Bodies” rather than “Collage Works to Ceramic Bodies.” Workings keeps the whole thing alive. These aren’t finished collages being retrospectively classified; they are working bodies, provisional constructions through which the practice thinks and wayfares.

    And there is a subtle distinction in the title worth retaining:

    Gathering Towards
    rather than
    Gathering For

    “Towards” doesn’t presume the destination.

    The ceramic body is not the predetermined end of the collage. It is one possible emergence from the gathering.

    That allows the title to hold the whole proposition:

    Gathering — the archive, readings, images, traces, bodies
    Towards — movement without destination
    A Futurity — possibility rather than prediction
    through Clay — material troubling and transformation
    Collage Workings — operative spatial constructs~transports
    to Ceramic Bodies — persistence, porosity, withdrawal, encounter

    And I think this gives futurity a particularly useful position in your developing vocabulary. It isn’t simply future. It is the capacity of a present material gathering to open onto something not yet determined.

    The collage therefore doesn’t illustrate a future ceramic.

    It makes a place from which the ceramic can become otherwise.

    Gathering Towards A Futurity through Clay
    → gathering
    → collage
    → proximity
    → hospitality of difference
    → troubling
    → clay
    → transformation
    → futurity

    And this gives us another dimension of the anarchive

    We’ve been saying:

    The archive is not proving the present practice. It is becoming capable of corresponding with it.

    Now perhaps:

    The anarchive does not preserve the past. It releases the gathered towards futurity.

    That feels very close to what these collages are actually doing.

    The images are full of unfinished spatial propositions: fragments that look architectural without becoming architecture, surfaces that resemble plans but don’t resolve as plans, marks that suggest notation, apertures, thresholds, bodies, routes. They are neither preparatory drawings nor resolved compositions.

    They are speculative spatial bodies.

    And that makes futurity through clay different from a conventional idea of ceramic development.

    It isn’t:

    collage → design → ceramic object

    It is more like:

    collage → proposition → troubling → clay → material reciprocity → fire → unknowability → ceramic body

    The ceramic body is therefore not the answer to the collage.

    It is what the collage makes possible without being able to determine it.

    Gathering Towards A Futurity through Clay — the movement towards the ceramic body; gathering, collage, troubling, transformation.
    The Ceramic Body is an actively Attentively~Troubling Permeable Chamber — the condition after that movement; the ceramic body as an active, persistent, waiting spatial body.

    “Gathering Towards a Futurity through Clay” is a conceptual and spatial art framework—explored notably in contemporary material and architectural research by practitioners like Russell Moreton—describing how collages, unmapped fragments, and physical material interactions release the ceramic body toward speculative, unfinished futures.

    Core Ideas.

    The Anarchive:

    Moving past historical preservation to release gathered material traces forward into an open-ended future.

    Speculative Bodies:

    Using provisional sketches, spatial collages, and textures that suggest architecture without locking into rigid designs.

    Permeable Chambers:

    Viewing the final ceramic object not as a fixed product, but as an active, waiting spatial container that holds ongoing transformation.

  • CLAY: Thinking Architecture/Exploratory Research/Vocabulary

    Spatial Bodies in Architectural and Contemporary Art.

    Exploratory Clay/Ceramic Based Inquiry.

    The material is just part of the vocabulary of meaning.

    Thinking Poetics : Architecture and Ceramics.

    Permeable Chambers

    My practice begins with clay as a material for thinking through making. I work between ceramics, sculpture, drawing and spatial practice, exploring how bodily movement, material resistance, intuition, reading and memory become entangled through processes of making. I understand this as a practice of correspondence: not the imposition of a predetermined form upon passive matter, but an attentive negotiation in which material and maker continually alter the conditions of one another.

    I am particularly interested in the threshold between clay and ceramic. Clay remains responsive and vulnerable; ceramic carries this responsiveness through transformation. Firing does not simply conclude the making but changes the conditions through which the work can continue to be encountered. The first firing opens a porous body onto which further materials, marks and forces can gather. White slip, originally encountered as an industrial kiln wash used to protect kiln furniture, becomes a surface-making agent. Yellow ochre moves between watery slip, finding and entering hollows, and a thicker mixture with molochite that behaves as a kind of rendering. A subsequent higher firing, using gas and reduction, carbonises the ceramic body and transforms what has gathered upon it.

    These processes have led me to think beyond the idea of the surface as a finished skin or boundary. I am increasingly interested in surfacing: something coming through from the depth of an ongoing material encounter. The surface is not simply where making ends, but where forces continue to emerge. Bodily gestures, pressure, abrasion, hesitation, material resistance, firing, thought and accumulated encounters become temporarily visible, while remaining capable of further transformation.

    The resulting surface is therefore ecological to the existence of the ceramic. It participates in producing the volume, its atmosphere and its interiority. It holds processes without containing them. Perforations become openings for breath, light and circulation; they connect interior darkness with the changing atmosphere of the surrounding space. The ceramic becomes simultaneously surface and chamber, exterior and interior, material body and spatial threshold.

    I think of these works as permeable chambers. Interiority is not enclosed within the object but produced through relations: between surface and depth, body and material, light and darkness, making and thinking, past encounters and future possibilities. The chamber gathers these relations without resolving them. It becomes a temporary landing site in which something can arrive, become perceptible, and then return to the field of making.

    What surfaces can re-enter.

    A gesture can return as another gesture; a reading can return through material; an encounter with the ceramic can become a proposition for another work. In this sense, the work does not move simply from clay to finished ceramic. It continually moves between depths, surfaces, interiors and thresholds.

    The ceramic is therefore not a conclusion to making but a speculative body within its continuation: a sensate chamber in which material, spatial and philosophical relations can gather, weather and begin again.

    Urns : Immersive Cells of Containment~Dissolution.

    In And Out Of Material. 2007.

    All our senses scan the space in front of us; the future, in both a literal and metaphorical sense, lies before us.

    Tony Cragg, 1998.

    Cutting Things Up.

    Material In Space.

    Scale.

    Impulses through Drawing.

    Working Things.

    Generation/Generative/Material.

    I think mass and energy need to be generated, any effective change has to be generated. It’s to do with a positive directed initiative to change things.

    “Generative” for me, in terms of my work, is the fact that within my own work, within any given period the work generates itself and there is a self-generating characteristic. The work I’m making today is only possible because of the previous work of three or four months ago and that was only possible because of the work of nine or twelve months ago.

    Even if it’s not a linear thing, things are generating. There is a sort of self-propagating, self-generative energy that is inherent in the material, I think. And even in the term “generative”, from “genus”, is the idea of making a family group of things, whether making an associative group of things or creating a population, a species of things which “relativise” generation.

    Tony Cragg.

    The material is just part of the vocabulary of meaning.

    Cragg wanted to give the materials ‘more meaning, mythology and poetry. He used the skills available to him at the EKWC residency to create ambiguities and tensions, to suggest past and present, to complicate rather than to describe.

    European Ceramic Work Centre, Netherlands. 1990, 1992.

    With the return of Cragg to studio based work in the early 1990s, when he was experimenting with clay; ideas around humanness, archaeology, and ritual were being explored within different areas of the fine arts. In addition, studio ceramics were frequently using the vessel as an initiating point to develop new forms and sculptural ideas.

    Laibe, with its rich possibilities of interpretation that incorporates the past in the present and the universal aspects of human survival within the ceramic vessel form, lies at the heart of these complex and overlapping areas of practice.

    Imogen Racz. 2009.

    Reading List from The Ceramics Reader. 2017.

    Andrew Livingstone, Kevin Petrie.

    Ceramics : Materiality and Metaphor.

    Why are Ceramics Important?

    The Existential Base, Philip Rawson.

    Containers of Life: Pottery and Social Relations, Silvia Forni.

    Ceramics and Metaphor.

    Analogy and Metaphor in Ceramic Art, Philip Rawson.

    Sculptural Vessels, Tony Cragg’s Laibe and the Metaphors of Clay, Imogen Racz.

    Ceramics in Contexts.

    Historical Precedents.

    Studio Ceramics.

    Sculptural Ceramics.

    Ceramics and Installation.

    Theoretical Perspectives.

    Conceptual and Post Studio Practice.

    Contemporary Clay, Clare Twomey.

    Extending Vocabularies: Distorting the Ceramic Familiar

    Clay and the Performative ‘Other’, Andrew Livingstone.

    Gender, Sexuality and Ceramics.

    Identity and Ceramics.

    Image.

    Figuration and the Body.

    Ceramics in Education.

    Ceramics, Industry and New Technologies.

    Museum, Site and Display.

    Re-defining Ceramics through Exhibitionary Practice (1970-2009), Laura Breen.

    With Fire.

    Richard Hirsch.

    A Life Between Chance And Design.

    Scott Meyer.

    Russell Moreton
    clay-based-practices
    spatial practice
    research creation
    ecology of experience

    Clay begins to think architecture differently. Enclosure, interior, aperture, surface and volume become less like spatial descriptions and more like sensations within a material body. The architectural begins to move closer to touch: pressure, resistance, piercing, gravity, fire and gesture. Clay~ceramic becomes an atmospheric body, moving between inside and outside, receiving and returning forces. What emerges is not architecture translated into clay, but spatial thinking aroused from the material itself—a correspondence between bodies, spaces and the things that pass between them.

    This practice has not developed through a linear progression of ideas, but through a shifting ecology of encounters.

    Ceramics, drawing, photography, architecture, interiority, landscape, teaching, spatial research and collaborative making have remained in correspondence across different periods of the work. Some propositions have receded; others have returned years later in altered material conditions. Earlier works continue to participate in the present, not as resolved historical stages but as active traces within an ongoing search.

    The practice is therefore situated rather than sequential.

    Its formation has taken place through materials, places, bodies, architectures, organisms, images, texts, tools and other people. Each enters differently, producing correspondences that can alter the direction of the work. Knowledge is not simply gathered and applied, but emerges through these encounters.

    The studio becomes a site of this activity: a place where research can remain provisional, where material processes can think alongside theoretical propositions, and where visual and spatial material can hold different ontological positions without requiring them to settle into a single explanation.

    Clay has become an increasingly important participant in this ecology. Through making, the material receives traces of pressure, resistance, repetition, weathering, drilling and repair. Surfaces become histories of encounters; cavities become interiors produced by action; minor gestures accumulate into larger spatial conditions.

    What appears in the present is therefore never entirely new.

    It is a surfacing.

    Earlier concerns with the body, absence and trace correspond with current questions of perforation, ecological agency and material interiority. Architectural research returns through the vessel and the cavity. Interiority becomes porous. Repetition becomes difference. A minor gesture can move an entire ecology.

    I understand this as a spatial practice of learning to make.

    The practice remains open to what it has not yet understood. Its research is a gathering of correspondences rather than a search for a final position: a situated ecology in which materials, histories, organisms, spaces, images, texts and gestures can continue to enter, disturb and transform one another.

    The work does not simply record where the practice has been.

    It creates conditions for where it might go next.

    Archival / Anarchival

    This is the most immediately current of the three and should sit firmly within Ceramic Bodies.

    What makes it interesting in relation to the migration is that the title itself announces the transition we have been uncovering: clay is now doing the architectural thinking.

    The important thing is not that clay is being used to make architectural forms. It is that architectural questions—space, enclosure, interiority, aperture, body, threshold—are becoming material questions within clay.

    That distinction is crucial.

    The earlier spatial posts often constructed situations through architecture, drawing, apparatus, walking and scaffolding. Here, the ceramic body increasingly becomes the site where those relations are felt.

    This is exactly where your recent formulation becomes useful:

    The spatial language of other bodies and their situatedness is, for me, an arousal from the clay body.

    The post can therefore be read as a moment where the spatial practice moves closer to touch. The architectural vocabulary doesn’t disappear; it becomes embodied through clay.

    This one should probably become a key connective post in the migration because it sits almost exactly at the point we have been discovering:

    spatial practice → spatial bodies → touch → clay body → force~feeling → becoming spaces

    And I think this post also gives us an opportunity to change how we understand the whole archive. The older spatial texts aren’t simply research that preceded the ceramics. They are bodies of thinking that have gradually become more tactile.

    The new clay work doesn’t abandon that archive. It draws it into the body.

    That makes the three-post movement especially nice:

    Creative Act
    → energy between poetic and systematic

    Raveningham / Wayfaring
    → situated attention through movement and ground

    Clay / Thinking Architecture
    → situated attention becomes material, tactile and reciprocal

    Or, more simply:

    energy → wayfaring → touch

    And that feels very close to the direction you have been articulating today: clay~ceramic as an atmospheric body that carries your murmurings while remaining open to the murmurings of other bodies.

  • A Hut within Matter(s) of Space~Surfacing

    2026, Gatherings A Hut within Matter(s) of Space~Surfacing 2015-26.

    Abstract.

    This text revisits an earlier spatial inquiry through the material conditions of clay, ceramic bodies, drawing, reading and making. What began through questions of interiority, architecture, the sensing body and the spaces between things has continued to gather through material encounters, where earlier propositions return differently through clay. The text understands spatial practice as a condition of correspondence: bodies, materials, gestures, memories, spaces and atmospheres entering into relations without a predetermined outcome. Clay becomes a place where these relations can be gathered, altered and partially forgotten. Through drying, firing, layering, scoring, wrapping and perforation, what has been encountered may become force~felt, transformed and later resurface as another material or spatial condition. The paper develops through five gatherings: Entering the Body, Tracing the Encounter, Making the Chamber, The Hole, and Surfacing Otherwise. These are not stages or conclusions, but little spatial gestures through which an earlier practice can be re-entered. The body becomes permeable; the trace carries an encounter without preserving it; the chamber gathers without completely containing; the hole opens absence towards relation; and surfacing describes the movement through which material encounters find another spatial condition. Alongside these gatherings, Tensions and Correlations : Wrapped~Tensioned and Bandaged Bodies considers the ceramic body through protective refractory layers, scoring, binding and tension. The bandage protects while recording vulnerability; wrapping holds while producing tension; the refractory layer prepares the body to enter fire. Surface becomes not simply a boundary or treatment, but a field across which forces become perceptible. The ceramic body consequently becomes less an autonomous object than a body in correspondence: held, opened, marked, transformed and made permeable to other bodies. What is gathered does not necessarily remain identifiable. A reading may become a gesture, a gesture may enter clay, clay may become ceramic, and ceramic may return as atmosphere. The practice therefore moves not towards resolution but towards further correspondence. The trace looks backwards. The proposition leans forwards. The ceramic occupies the interval between them.

    Gatherings: Notes Towards a Particular Spatial Practice.

    This text revisits an earlier body of spatial inquiry through a vocabulary that has emerged
    subsequently through working with clay, ceramic bodies, reading, drawing and material
    encounters. Rather than correcting or replacing the earlier propositions, the text allows
    them to be encountered again as spatial conditions: bodies, traces, interiors, thresholds,
    gestures and atmospheres beginning to gather differently.


    The five gatherings act as operative spaces rather than sequential arguments. Each
    gathers an earlier proposition and allows it to move into another relation, where thought
    becomes spatial and spatial experience becomes affective. The movement is therefore
    less towards knowledge than towards force~feeling: sensed intensities through which
    bodies, materials, memories and ideas come into correspondence.


    Within this transition, the earlier text begins to reveal a developing concern with
    permeability. The body is not understood as a fixed container, nor space as a passive
    environment, but as a condition through which bodies may enter, alter and be altered.
    Traces become chambers; holes become sensing organs; surfaces become sites of
    encounter; and interiority becomes something generated between bodies rather than
    contained within one.


    The gatherings therefore offer a future reading of an earlier practice. They do not claim to
    know what the work was before it was made, but allow its latent propositions to resurface
    through another vocabulary. What was once approached through spatial inquiry can now
    be felt as a gathering of material, affective and temporal relations. Earlier interiorities are
    not left behind; they are carried forward into matter, where they may be altered,
    forgotten, transformed and encountered again.


    The text remains deliberately tentative. Its propositions are not conclusions but places
    from which further correspondence might begin. The gathering becomes both a spatial
    verb and a mode of becoming: an opening through which what has already been
    encountered may continue to move towards bodies, materials and possibilities not yet
    known.


    Keywords
    Spatial Practice · Gatherings · Material Reciprocity · ForceFeeling · Permeability ·
    Interiority · Affect · Correspondence · Ceramic Bodies · Spatial Atmosphere · Thresholds ·
    Embodied Practice · Hapticity · Kairos · Productive Unknowing · Material Becoming

    A Hut within Matter(s) of SpaceSurfacing 2026
    A HUT WITHIN THE INFLUENCE AND NATURE OF ARCHITECTURE 2015.


    The tendency of technological culture to standardize environmental conditions and make the environment entirely predictable is causing a serious sensory impoverishment. Our buildings have lost their opacity and depth, sensory invitation and discovery, mystery and shadow.
    Juhani Pallasmaa, “Hapticity and Time: Notes on Fragile Architecture,” 2000.


    The Scriptorium.

    Description of Work.


    The ruined site of the abbey at Waverley, near Farnham, has been appropriated as a site and as a place within which to position and develop architectural and sociological inquiries. The design processes of interiors have been employed as tools both to critique and to explore how we might further develop the contents of architecture. This spatiality, and its diffractions of differences and similarities, narratives and subjective experiences, are what my interior spaces attempt to initiate.


    Design becomes an interactive structure, an interlocutory interior in the making of space and spatial relations.


    Interior design presented as an interactive and immersive spatial inquiry.


    The Scriptorium brings together a varied and discursive set of objects, texts and interior architectures. This work seeks to understand how the virtual changes physical architecture and how this affects the space between people and buildings. The “performativity of research” is presented through specifically designed apparatuses and partitions. These designed components and made objects, together with annotated texts and drawings, conspire to create a complex design-led inquiry: a “Place Study” staged in a niche-like space. This interior presents itself as both distinct from and relational to the other projects in the MA Interiors Show.


    The interior presents the many manifestations of creative research, structures and even symposia that have been developed through engaging with the site. The visualization of the research and the relational architectures rendered through montage and collage explores digital and analogue technologies. This hybridisation, together with the use of pinhole photography and film footage, further explores interests in the field of performance as an immaterial architecture drawn in the presence of place.


    The realisation of my interiors project consists of two separate but relational elements that are presented within a built environment. The small ‘Scriptorium’ is conceived as a space of refuge: an intimate, minimal construction that features a doorway and an interior containing a place for objects, perhaps books, as well as a small sitting area.


    This construction, an open cell perhaps, is evocative of a state of contemplation within the fabric of the everyday. The rather hybrid design appropriates a merging of minimalism, modernism and the plastic architecture of a ruined Cistercian Abbey.


    The construction comes into close contact with its occupant. It is a restricted spatial apparatus that attempts to promote, through its awkwardness, distinctive experiences. In particular, the apparatus of the Scriptorium and its materiality attempts to promote a sensory intensification that is further underpinned by the cognitive processes of reading and perhaps other social dialogues.


    The sensory intensification of a hut-like space promotes a haptic sensibility, allowing the nearness and intimacies of both the built space and the imaginative, virtual realm to become entangled. Ultimately, the Scriptorium is trying to build on unique human subjectivities that are manifested through a kinaesthetic repertoire, or script, that helps to enact further spatial experiences.


    It might be useful to think of this constructed space as itself still under construction: a site that acts as its own vessel within the multiplicities of human perception itself.


    The influence of the Cistercian Order, the site of Waverley Abbey and its pastoral landscape have all contributed to a sense of the design process. The Scriptorium, like the ruins themselves, is open to the elements.


    Waverley Abbey remains as a sensory site between the remains of architecture and its society and the effects of our own global culture in the information age.


    In troubled times they all sought to experience life away from social definitions of success or failure. From there, these primitive huts marked personal, original inquiries into the ever-mysterious nature of human existence.
    Anne Cline, A Hut of One’s Own: Life Outside the Circle of Architecture.


    The Scriptorium began through research into both architecturally themed texts and documentation of the site, alongside creative practice involving photography—digital, analogue and film—and the art practices of collage and drawing.


    The many visits promoted my own subjectivities to the site, and these were also frequently subjected to change by the intervention of others in unexpected ways. These social intrusions by others revealed the very boundaries that the historic site engenders, some playful, others malicious.


    These extremities within the social order of the visitors became problematic in designing for the site itself. An earlier proposal to host a symposium centred on the Arts and the Humanities, using the Abbey and its surrounding grounds, appeared to be a project of vast diversity and logistics, better suited to a cultural project through arts management and funding.


    As the project developed, certain creative methodologies around particularities of the site itself began to appear, the notion of the palimpsest being one of them. This promoted the idea of a reading room: an ephemeral interior space that gathers up the experiential values of ‘ruins’ and re-enacts them as a site to explore the architectures of images.


    It became apparent that ‘palimpsest’ could be both a visual surface of erasures, earlier markings partially overwritten by newer ones, ‘annotations’, and a scaffold of developing ideas, clearly visible as they merge and adapt into the very usage of the site.


    These re-imaginings through the notion of palimpsest seemed filmic and, as such, would be able to display a vast amount of diversity and subject matter: a library of resources that would require users, an audience, or both.


    The referencing of the reading room to the library, and the symposium to the cinema or theatre, allowed me to realise that I was dealing with a number of spatial arrangements that needed to develop together, but which could be employed separately.


    In an era in which architecture is once more learning its potential as a form of inquiry, rather than as a service—as a producer of knowledge, and not merely of ‘projects’.
    Brett Steele, “Atlas-Tectonics in Barkow Leibinger,” Bricoleur Bricolage, AA, 2013.


    Inquiry is essentially the way of learning.
    J. Krishnamurti, The Cultivation of a Good Mind, Brockwood, 1963.


    The Theatre of Research became the vehicle through which to see if this collaboration might be possible.
    The use of image and text in my architectural collages allowed me to visualise associations and to create possibilities for interior spaces that might be manifested within the built environment. The use of collage in architecture is widely acknowledged by architects such as Mies van der Rohe, Daniel Libeskind and Rem Koolhaas.


    The ability of the collage process to juxtapose fragments, images and texts from irreconcilable origins into an experience that is visual, tactile and time-based makes it an interesting tool within the realms of architectural design.
    Collage begins to visualise not only the structure of spaces but also their content and circulation. The Theatre of Research is interested in how to promote collage and its use as a cognitive and perceptive tool in architecture.
    Collage and montage are quintessentially techniques in modern and contemporary art and filmmaking.

    Collage combines pictorial motifs and fragments from disconnected origins into a new synthetic entity, which casts new roles and meanings to the parts. It suggests new narratives, dialogues, juxtapositions and temporal durations. Its elements lead double-lives; the collaged ingredients are suspended between their originary essences and the new roles assigned to them by the poetic ensemble.
    Juhani Pallasmaa, “The World is a Collage” / Jennifer A. H. Shields, Collage and Architecture.


    Reflective Analysis.


    Both the Scriptorium and the Theatre of Research exist only in the form of the exhibition presentation. What they singularly or together propose can only be imagined through their manifested form as static objects placed within a built structure that loosely references architectural concerns and materials.


    They appear diminished and assigned to the voyeuristic gaze of the visitor, who is equally curious and dismissive. These objects and the interior spaces they promote seem stilled and stalled. As much as they appear beyond reach, it is as if the authenticity of their materials and construction has somehow been subsumed by their stature and scale.


    The issues and qualities of which they are attempting to speak seem reduced by the hegemony of vision. There is little hapticity and time to encounter, only, it seems, through investing narratives can we begin to re-enact the spatial encounter.


    The question I ask is: do these objects and their interior spaces cause me to think beyond mere representation and recognition, or rather do they create enough of an encounter to force me to engage with them, even if I or the viewer are uncertain as to their meaning or possible outcome?
    Deleuze comments that something forces us to think. This something is not an object of recognition, but a fundamental encounter: something that challenges us.


    Have these miniature architectures of objects become relational? Do we start to use them in perhaps a heuristic manner, a hands-on approach to learning or inquiry, something that we can discover for ourselves?


    This heuristic finding-out could be made informative through collective collaborations and exhibition through the Theatre of Research.


    Is design stripping us of our qualitative spaces as digital tooling removes the maker’s trace?


    The model object has served as a thinking place in the development of the idea of the Scriptorium. The materials used and their proportions echo interests in Minimalist Sculpture, the intervals between things in the work of Donald Judd, and the architectural languages of memory and tectonics of the craftsman-turned-architect Peter Zumthor.


    This open-sided hut seems cut away, almost anatomical, as if we were looking into the internal workings of an environment and resident. The structure would have to be made relational to its surroundings if it were to be placed in the landscape: adaptations to weather and the structure would be necessary to make it serviceable for use.


    The Scriptorium has analogues to the notion of a fireplace and its chimney stack. It is at the heart of a building: the place of warmth, of dialogue, and, through fire, of the imagination.
    The incompleteness that surrounds the Scriptorium creatively asks for further design proposals that are even more site-specific.


    The Solar Pavilion built by the Smithsons utilised the old fireplace and chimney from the demolished cottage. Around this central element they developed the beginnings of their Modernist (Brutalist) pavilion, an architecture clad with glass, wood and zinc, contained by a walled garden and situated in the pastoral landscape of Wiltshire.


    Furthering the themes of being in the landscape, the Scriptorium could become an observatory, a place both to look out from and also to look in. The mobility, or need to be reassembled from site to site, could promote innovative design solutions, as well as interesting detailing or use of materials and surfaces that would facilitate interactions between visitors.


    The notion of the Scriptorium becoming clad by an exterior skin, an ephemeral membrane which would then render the differences between the interior and the exterior into the realms of an almost immaterial architectural experience, further develops the distinction between the unpredictable forces of nature outside and the predictable domestic spaces inside.


    This prompts further investigation into an architecture that blurs the boundaries between architecture and nature. This could be further explored through the notion of quixotic gestures, art and performance that can capture the experience and experiential engagement with the natural elements.
    The Scriptorium becomes the centred structure of remnant, surrounded by an architecture that can create imprecise boundaries through inconsistent materials. This spatial arrangement will create its own qualitative responses, dialogues and subsequent movements.


    Architecture in this context becomes purely a sensorial response.


    The body as the vector for active mediation with the world of the spirit. The body is the instrument of a qualitative evaluation, the measure of intensity, which alone is capable of giving space extension and modifying it. Space is no objective parameter; it must be ‘excavated’ in relation to the mobile living parametrics of the body.
    Frédéric Migayrou, “Architectures of the Intensive Body,” Yves Klein, Guggenheim, 2005.


    Mark Prizeman, Intensity: Ephemeral, Portable Architecture.


    Time, space and existence are amongst the greatest of themes—so great that we could never be so presumptuous as to think we could do them justice, and too close for us ever to escape them, whether with our thoughts or actions, in life or in art.
    Peter Lodermeyer, “Personal Structures: Time. Space. Existence,” 2009.

    My design project has attempted to produce spaces and their interiors, together with the apparatus of the Scriptorium, that qualitatively seek to inquire into the world we inhabit.
    The Theatre of Research attempts to establish some sense of a community that can do fieldwork that invigorates the perception of the environment.
    My own interests are centred on experientially and mindfully exploring voids, cavities and spaces between things, together with the use of clay, glass and other vernacular materials.
    As an interior designer/artist, I have become experiential to the agency of spaces. The Theatre of Research becomes a meeting place for furthering my programme, initially proposed as a symposium at Waverley Abbey.


    Reflective Critique / Appraisal.


    How might I start again?


    The Scriptorium would need to collect and question considerably more qualitative data. Some sort of portable shelter, lightweight and offering some protection from the elements, would have allowed longer periods of stay and the possibility of experiencing different times of day.


    The activity of walking to the site, of having to incorporate it into a journey, would help to create a stronger sense of place and routine.


    I am interested in the ‘thingness’ of this place, its influence, and how its influence might be transposed into a methodology of reading, theorising and making.


    I am reminded of Peter Brook, who deliberately demolished his avant-garde theatre building, Bouffes du Nord in Paris, so that he could create a more emotionally responsive space for theatre.
    It is this influence of the Abbey that I wish to explore as a creative catalyst, a tool that picks up on its differences as qualitative readings.


    The ruin, by its very nature, has redefined its own architecture from one of form into one of experience: a sense of liminality or immateriality that constitutes itself as architectural experience.
    A good space cannot be neutral, for an impersonal sterility gives no food to the imagination. The Bouffes has the magic and poetry of a ruin, and anyone who allowed themselves to be invaded by the atmosphere of a ruin knows strongly how the imagination is let loose.


    Peter Brook, The Open Circle / Andrew Todd, Peter Brook’s Theatre Environments, 2003.


    How might the performativity of research be staged, and into what contexts might it be appropriated?


    As Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht notes, we live in a culture of meaning, not in a culture of presence. We constantly produce effects of meaning and multiply them with mass media. This applies not only to the humanities but also, to a large degree, to our wholly normal everyday lives. And in this respect, our experience of presence is getting drastically lost.


    Artworks may never completely be explained by theory or meaning. The sensual, material makeup of the work in its presence is not the cinders, slag and ashes, the undigested remains of theory, but remains of an intensified moment.


    SENSORY THEATRE
    EX MACHINA — Robert Lepage
    While Lepage continues to pioneer the use of technology, his work is imbued with an intimacy and humanity that few can match. Edinburgh Festival, 2015.


    ABBATOIR FERME — Jan Fabre (Troubleyn, Performing Arts)


    A SOMATIC ARCHIVE, of subjectivities whose perceptions and environments are going to change forever; like the particularities of the analogue trace in photography that is now becoming a distant experiential condition, an orphan, extinct from the subjectivities of its originating culture/organism.


    The Waverley Inquiry
    A Theoretical and Somatic Search amongst Ruins and Archetypes.


    Research Perspectives.


    Dwelling / Poetics — Heidegger Archetypes / Symbols — Jung.
    Flesh and Stone — Richard Sennett Flesh and the Logic of Sensation — Deleuze / Bacon.
    Contemporary Spatial Practices.
    Feminist Geographies The Posthuman.
    Posthuman thought inscribes the contemporary subject in the conditions of its own historicity.
    Rosi Braidotti, Posthuman Subjectivity.


    LIGHT into SOMATIC SPACES.
    Continuum and Chora Light and the shadow of chora.
    Life expresses itself in a multiplicity of empirical acts: there is nothing to say, but everything to do. Life, simply by being life, expresses itself by actualizing flows of energies, through codes of vital information across complex somatic, cultural and technologically networked systems.
    Braidotti, 2013:190.


    Architecture / Body / Space.
    De Architectura — Vitruvius
    Architecture consists of order, arrangement, proportion or eurythmy, symmetry and décor, and distribution.
    Arrangement as an “Idea” refers to the Aristotelian notion of “image-representation” as phantasia, a precondition to drawing, effectively occupying and revealing a space between Being and becoming.


    Contents List from a Folder in the Theatre of Research.


    Chora, Body and Building.
    Space as Membrane.
    Chora — Exhibition, 1999.
    Lessons of a Dream — Karsten Harries
    Concrete Blonde — Joanna Merwood A probe into the negative spaces where mysteries are created.
    Surrealist Paris — Dagmar Motycka Watson The non-perspectival space of the lived city.
    Body and Building — George Dodds Essays on the changing relation of body and architecture.
    Sphere and Cross — Karsten Harries Vitruvian reflections on the Pantheon Type.
    Body and Building — Marcia F. Feuerstein Inside the Bauhaus’s Darker Side.
    Desiring Landscapes / Landscapes of Desire — George Dodds
    A Tradition of Architectural Figures — Marco Frascari.
    Intertwining Metamorphoses — Germano Celant On the work of Giuseppe Penone.
    Space as a Membrane — Siegfried Ebeling.


    Theatre of Research.


    Unlike a library, the Theatre of Research is a working space that creates and crafts both theoretical and practical objects, things and documentation.
    Its reason for being is to explore the praxis for creative narratives between the Arts and the Humanities. It attempts, through performance, fine art and architecture, to collage qualitative and diffractive dialogues into new relational discourses, the results of which become exhibited or staged as open workshops, engendering praxis, publication and production.


    In its fledgling state, it is seen as being part of a University faculty that has interests in the Arts and the Humanities. The possible linking with other establishments could be investigated.
    The working space becomes operational as a studio or laboratory that is engaged with full-time research-led activities. Separate yet collaborative spaces and activities promote an environment for inquiry and personal development.


    The Theatre of Research becomes a space that allows for the post-production of ideas into new forms of social interaction.
    The theoretical merging with the practical into a relational narrative or methodology enriches the practices of others, forming both new creative environments that can contain innovative ecologies and question global perspectives.


    From Inquiry to Correspondence.

    Moreton’s earlier writing can be encountered as the beginning of a spatial practice whose concerns have continued to move between bodies, materials, places and forms of attention. The Scriptorium, the Theatre of Research, the reading room, collage and the indexical body were initially articulated through questions of architecture, interiority, hapticity and experience. Yet within these early propositions there is already an interest in spaces that do not simply contain experience, but alter the conditions through which experience might occur.
    What has changed is perhaps less the subject of the inquiry than the material through which it is now encountered.
    The earlier language of research, methodology and spatial inquiry has gradually become more tentative, affective and reciprocal. Reading is no longer necessarily a means of gathering information, but a way of becoming susceptible to other bodies of thought. Architecture is not simply represented, but entered through sensation, memory, atmosphere and the body. Clay subsequently intensifies this condition: it receives pressure, gesture, resistance and touch, but does not return them unchanged.
    In this movement, Moreton’s practice becomes less concerned with positioning itself within an established ecology than with entering an ecology sufficiently to be altered by it. This permeability introduces a different understanding of making and learning. Encounters may be gathered without being fully retained; they may disappear into material processes and resurface later as sensation, form, atmosphere or force. What is forgotten is not necessarily lost. It may become available to another body, another material condition, another atmosphere.
    The earlier concepts of chamber, threshold, palimpsest, void and interiority can therefore be understood as having continued to travel. They have moved from architectural propositions into material conditions. The chamber becomes permeable; the palimpsest becomes material becoming; the void becomes a hole; the threshold becomes a sensing organ; the surface becomes a site of correspondence.
    This movement also gives a different significance to asperity. Friction is not only resistance between separate things, but a condition through which bodies meet, catch, interrupt and sometimes slip into one another. The asperity is the point at which correspondence becomes sensible: a reading can slip into an image, an image into a gesture, a gesture into clay, clay into ceramic, and ceramic into atmosphere.
    Matter(s) of spacesurfacing describes the movement through which material encounters become spatial intensities. What is gathered through clay does not remain contained within the ceramic body. It migrates through surface, aperture, interior, shadow, light, proximity and atmosphere, becoming perceptible in the encounter between bodies. Surfacing does not mean revealing something hidden beneath a surface. It describes a becoming: an intensity finding another spatial condition through which it can be sensed. A pressure may surface as contour; resistance as aperture; repetition as rhythm; absence as interiority; a remembered gesture as atmosphere.
    The resulting practice remains deliberately unfinished. It does not claim to resolve the relations it gathers. Instead, it creates provisional chambers in which thought, material and sensation can remain in correspondence. Kairos accompanies this condition of unknowingness: the moment in which an encounter becomes capable of producing something not yet fully conceivable.


    From this perspective, the five propositions that follow are not stages in a development, but thresholds through which an existing spatial practice continues to become otherwise.


    Recovering Research Bodies.
    Spatial Propositions.


    Correspondences across both Moretons.


    The interior was already not really an interior.


    An earlier Moreton describes the Scriptorium as an “open cell”, a refuge that remains open to the elements, and later imagines an exterior membrane that destabilises the distinction between inside and outside.
    This is remarkably close to Moreton’s current permeable chamber.
    The body was already the measure of spatial intensity.


    The passage on the “intensive body” is not simply an architectural reference. Moreton’s text immediately moves towards voids, cavities and spaces between things, and towards clay and vernacular materials.
    This now reads as an early formulation of Moreton’s sensing body.


    The palimpsest already anticipates material memory.
    An earlier Moreton described the palimpsest as both a surface of erasure and a scaffold where earlier and newer markings remain partially visible.
    This is close to what Moreton now encounters through clay as an ecology of accumulated encounters, productive forgetting and resurfacing.


    An earlier Moreton was already dissatisfied with representation
    The most important question may actually be this:
    “do these objects and their interior spaces cause me to think beyond mere representation and recognition…”
    That question can now be understood as a philosophical precursor to Moreton’s concern with forcefeeling. The emphasis has shifted from what an object represents towards what happens between bodies when an encounter takes place.


    The Theatre of Research already contains the germ of Moreton’s current spatial practice.


    The final proposition describes a space that brings theoretical and practical objects together, through performance, fine art and architecture, producing “qualitative and diffractive dialogues” and new relational discourses.


    Today, Moreton might call this less a Theatre of Research and more a chamber of correspondence.
    Perhaps the most interesting thing about revisiting this material is that Moreton does not need to retrospectively make the old text say what he is now saying.
    The earlier work already contains the beginnings.


    The later ceramic practice seems to have entered the old architectural inquiry rather than abandoned it. The hut becomes chamber; the chamber becomes body; the body becomes permeable; the void becomes hole; the palimpsest becomes material memory; the theatre becomes atmosphere; and research itself begins to loosen into affective inquiry, sensing, gathering and becoming.


    A SPATIAL PRACTICE IN BECOMING.
    The older architectural work can therefore be read not as an abandoned stage of the practice, but as another chamber within it. Its propositions remain active, not as origins to which the later work must return, but as material and conceptual bodies capable of being re-entered.


    The Scriptorium.
    The hut.
    The ruin.
    The reading room.
    The Theatre of Research.
    The collage.
    The indexical body.
    The hole.
    The ceramic chamber.
    The wrapped and tensioned body.


    Tensions and Correlations : Wrapped Tensioned and Bandaged Bodies.


    The wrapped and tensioned body extends the earlier concern with vulnerability, protection and spatial relation into the material conditions of ceramic making. What was once encountered through membrane, enclosure, skin and threshold now becomes materially present through layering, wrapping, scoring, binding and tension.
    The white refractory layer operates almost as a bandage: a protective skin applied in anticipation of fire. It covers, protects and partially obscures the ceramic body, while remaining visibly contingent upon the forces it is intended to withstand. Protection therefore becomes another form of correspondence between body, material and force.


    The scorings across the white surface introduce another register. They mark, divide and traverse the body, establishing lines along which tensions can be sensed. These marks are not simply graphic additions to an already completed surface; they register a field of forces across it.


    The bandage protects, but also records vulnerability.
    The wrapping holds, but also produces tension.
    The refractory layer protects the body so that it can enter the fire.


    What appears as surface treatment therefore becomes a spatial and material proposition. The surface begins to behave less as a skin that simply encloses the body and more as a field through which pressures, protections, interruptions and relations become perceptible.
    Wrappedtensioned and bandaged bodies extend the practice’s earlier concern with the interior and the membrane into a ceramic condition. The body is held, but not sealed; protected, but not isolated; marked, but not fully determined.


    The ceramic body is therefore not simply held together. It is held in relation.
    These are not separate subjects.
    They are different bodies of the same spatial inquiry.


    What changes is not simply the subject of the inquiry, but the material through which the inquiry becomes sensible.


    Architecture provided the first chambers.
    The body entered them.
    The archive gathered them.
    The collage allowed them to circulate.
    Clay absorbed them.
    Ceramic transformed them.
    Atmosphere returned them.
    And other bodies continue the process.


    This makes the practice neither simply architectural nor ceramic, neither research-led nor object-led.
    It is perhaps more tentatively understood as a practice of correspondence:
    a way of becoming sufficiently permeable to matter, bodies, readings, places and forces that they can alter one another.


    The work does not seek closure.
    It makes chambers in which something might happen.
    It gathers without completely containing.
    It remembers by forgetting.
    It withdraws while remaining available to encounter.
    And the spatial practice continues in the interval between what has surfaced and what has yet to become.
    The trace looks backwards.
    The proposition leans forwards.
    The chamber holds the interval between them.
    And the next body has not yet arrived.


    From Thresholds to Gatherings.


    The original text approached these propositions as thresholds: spatial conditions marking passages between body, image, memory, architecture, material and thought. In revisiting them, however, the threshold has begun to operate differently. It no longer describes a boundary between one condition and another, but a place where different bodies begin to affect one another.


    The threshold has therefore become operative.


    What was once understood as a passage can now be understood as a gathering: an active spatial condition in which bodies, materials, readings, memories, gestures and atmospheres accumulate without necessarily resolving into a singular meaning. Gathering does not imply completion. It allows something to assemble provisionally, to remain porous, and to become capable of further correspondence.


    In this sense, the five propositions can be read as a kind of spatial Five Memos: not principles to be applied, but movements through which the practice continues to think, make and become. Each gathering carries something forward from the original text while allowing it to encounter the vocabulary that has subsequently emerged through clay, ceramic, permeability, material reciprocity, affect and spatial practice.


    The movement is therefore not:
    threshold → passage → arrival
    but:
    gathering → correspondence → transformation → further gathering.


    The five propositions remain open in this movement. They are not stages of a method, nor a hierarchy of ideas, but spatial operations through which one body can enter the company of another.


    Gathering~Spatial~Bodies


    Propositional Enterings : The Body~Other Bodies.

    The body is not simply the subject of the work but its first spatial condition. To enter the body is to encounter a mutable interiority: flesh, memory, sensation, movement and imagination gathered together without becoming fully knowable.
    The body becomes a spatial proposition rather than a fixed figure. It is already permeable, already exchanging with the world; its interiority is produced through these exchanges.


    Tracing the Encounter.

    The trace records an encounter without preserving the encounter itself.
    An imprint, gesture, drawing or mark carries something forward while allowing something else to disappear. The trace is therefore neither evidence nor representation alone. It is a material remainder through which another body may encounter what is no longer present. Its incompleteness is part of its capacity to correspond.
    The indexical body begins here to move from living body towards ceramic body.


    Making the Chamber.

    The chamber gathers rather than contains. Its interior is not simply a bounded inside, but a condition produced through relations between bodies, materials, light, shadow, memory and atmosphere.
    Architecture is encountered as a collection of collective parts: surfaces, openings, enclosures, passages, bodies, light, shadow and atmosphere. The chamber becomes a space for inhabiting experience, a lived abstraction and a lived-in abstraction.
    Here spatial practice begins to move beyond the production of objects towards the production of conditions in which something might happen between bodies.
    The chamber remains deliberately incomplete.


    The Hole and its Holing.

    The hole becomes a particular spatial distinction.
    It is an excavation within the body, but also an opening through which another body, another atmosphere or another future may enter. In the earlier work, the human scale of the hole gives this apparently minor gesture considerable existential force: the centre of the body is present as absence.
    Later, smaller borings and perforations multiply this condition. The single hole becomes a field of openings; the exceptional threshold becomes porosity.
    The ceramic body does not merely occupy space. It develops organs through which space can be sensed, gathered and made otherwise.
    The hole is therefore not simply an absence within matter. It is a threshold-organ, an exploratory and speculative organ through which the ceramic body enters correspondence with other bodies.


    Surfacing Otherwise~Depths.
    What enters the material does not necessarily remain recognisable.
    Clay receives gesture, pressure, reading, memory, resistance and force, but through drying, alteration and firing these encounters undergo transformation. Something is forgotten; something persists; something else surfaces.
    This is productive forgetting.
    The ceramic does not return the encounter unchanged. It returns it as another body: surface, atmosphere, aperture, shadow, tension, weight, presence.
    What was gathered within clay may therefore surface later as something not yet known: not as the recovery of an original meaning, but as another material condition through which an encounter can begin again.


    The trace looks backwards.
    The proposition leans forwards.
    The ceramic occupies the interval between them.


    The five gatherings do not conclude the inquiry, but leave it open to further correspondence. Each gathers something from the previous text while allowing it to move elsewhere: from body to material, from trace to chamber, from reading to sensation, from interiority to atmosphere. They are not stages to be completed, but spatial propositions through which the practice can continue to sense, alter and be altered. What emerges remains tentative—held between what has been encountered and what has yet to become perceptible. In this sense, gathering is also a beginning: a way of becoming sufficiently permeable for what follows, for what cannot yet be known, but may be encountered as matter(s) of spacesurfacing.

    Exploring Spatial Practice Through Clay and Architecture
    This title is optimized for search engines by including relevant keywords like ‘spatial practice,’ ‘clay,’ and ‘architecture,’ which may attract users interested in these subjects. It provides clarity on the content’s focus, improving visibility.

    Gatherings: A Journey of Material and Space
    By using the word ‘gatherings,’ this title aligns with the thematic element of the post. It combines key phrases like ‘material’ and ‘space,’ optimizing for searches related to architectural inquiries and material exploration.

    The Scriptorium: Intersections of Space and Memory
    This title highlights the specific concept of the Scriptorium, drawing attention from niche audiences looking for content on spatial memory and design. Including ‘intersections’ suggests a complex exploration, improving engagement potential.

  • Bricolage Processes : Creative Audit of Research Topics and Processes

    Interiors/UCA Farnham. 2014

    THE ARCHITECTURE OF NATURAL LIGHT, Henry Plummer. 2009 THE OTHER ARCHITECTURE, Constructing metaphysical space.

    Catching The Light.

    The Entwined History of Light And Mind. Arthur Zajonc

    Anarchival note

    Re-entering / 2026 — Bricolage was never simply the gathering of fragments. It became a way of making situations in which different bodies of thought, image, material and memory could alter one another.

    Or, perhaps more closely aligned with your current vocabulary:

    Re-entering / 2026 — The scaffold does not determine what will emerge. It holds a provisional relation between bodies, allowing fragments, materials, images and thoughts to enter into correspondence.

    spatial bodies → situations → scaffolding → diffractive relations → exploratory making

    Bricolage Processes then reveals the method behind that practice: fragments, palimpsests, collage, ruins, reading rooms, material exchanges, the Theatre of Research and an open-ended bricolage process. It even describes the Theatre of Research as a space where theoretical and practical objects are produced through “diffractive dialogues”.

    EVANESCENCE

    Orchestration of light to mutate through time PROCESSION

    Choreography of light for the moving eye VEILS OF GLASS

    Refraction of light in a diaphanous film ATOMIZATION

    Sifting of light through a porous screen CANALIZATION

    Channelling of light through a hollow mass ATMOSPHERIC SILENCE

    Suffusion of light with a unified mood LUMINESCENCE

    Materialization of light in physical matter

    ADVENTURES OF THE FIRE, VESSELS THROUGH TIME CERAMIC GATE

    “The existing architectural environment is thought to be more or less official through the hierarchical arrangement, providing an rigidity to the public. The base for a creation is a freedom and I proposed an asymmetrical form for the gate to break the official space, bringing an atmosphere for freedom of creation. ”

    Jung-mook Moon. CERAMIC PAVILION

    “People make space, and space contains people. ” Seong-chil Park. (Exhibition Space Designer)

    PALIMPSEST AS REMAINS OF A CREATIVE PRAXIS STUDIO SPACE AS A PHILOSOPHICAL WORKSHOP

    PALIMPSEST IN ARCHITECTURE

    “Architects, archaeologists and design historians sometimes use the word to describe the accumulated iterations of a design or a site, whether in literal layers of archaeological remains, or by the figurative accumulation and reinforcement of design ideas over time. Whenever spaces are rebuilt or remodelled, evidence of former uses remain. ”

    Wikipedia

    RODIN AND BEUYS

    THE ALCHEMY OF BUILDING WORKING PRACTICES

    RUINS, REDUCTIONS, and the LOSS of SUBSTANCE.

    FRAGMENTS, ASSEMBLAGES and INTERIORS that re-enter the world of creativity.

    The Theatre of Research is a working space that creates and crafts both theoretical and practical objects, things and documentation. Its reason for being is to explore the praxis for creative narratives between the Arts and The Humanities. It attempts through performance, fine art and architecture to collage qualitative and diffractive dialogues into new relational discourses, the results of which become exhibited or staged as open workshops engendering praxis, publication and production. In its fledgling state it is seen as being part of a University faculty that has interests in the Arts and The Humanities.

    We have art so that we may not perish by the truth. Friedrich Nietzsche Can one achieve architecture without resorting to ‘design’? What if, instead of designing a new building, you keep the one skated for demolition? How do you insert an original program inside the old and new structures simultaneously? How do you reconcile coherence with multiplicity? Bernard Tschumi 2012

     PROGRAM. Tschumi, Le Fresnoy: Architecture In/Between, 1999/2012 Architecture was no longer an autonomous and isolated discipline but participated in the movement and confrontation of ideas. Tschumi, Red Is Not A Color. 2012

    Questions of Space

    Abstract Mediation and Strategy

    CREATIVE AUDIT of RESEARCH TOPICS The Craftsman, Richard Sennett. 2008

    “Making is thinking, the good craftsman uses solutions to uncover new territory; problem solving and problem finding are intimately related in his or her mind. For this reason curiosity can ask, “Why” as well as “How ” about any project. ”

    Prologue: Man as His Own Maker CRAFTSMEN

    The Troubled Craftsman The Workshop Machines

    Material Consciousness CRAFT

    The Hand

    Expressive Instructions Arousing Tools Resistance and Ambiguity CRAFTSMANSHIP Quality-Driven Work Ability

    Conclusion: The Philosophical Workshop BRICOLEUR BRICOLAGE, Barkow Leibinger. 2013

    “Bricolage indicates an approach that is inclusive, ie open-ended, and can come either from within architecture itself or from external sources. ”

    CASTING WEAVING

    FOLDING BUNDLING PRINTING ANTICIPATING

    FROM MODELS TO DRAWINGS, Marco Frascari. 2007 CRITICAL STUDIES IN ARCHITECTURAL HUMANITIES

    THE WAVERLEY PROJECT

    Imagination and Representation in Spatial Practices (Architecture, Fine Art and Performance).

    Historical Perspectives Emergent Realities Critical Dimensions

    CRISTINA IGLESIAS Guggenheim Museum 1998

    “Concrete and iron, glass, yellow, terracotta and tapestry, aluminium and photo etching, leather and amher glass, wood, resin and bronze powder, blue glass and alabaster. ”

    Introduction, Carmen Gimenez

    Screen Memories, Nancy Princenthal Stained With a Pale Light, Adrian Searle Wanting Shelter, Barbara Maria Stafford

    CHRIS WILMARTH. 1986 Delancey Backs (and Other Moments)

    Etched float/polished plate glass, steel and bronze, blown glass.

    BURNING ISSUES AND PRACTICAL CONCERNS

    THE READING ROOM

    The Neo-Romantic Vision from William Blake to the New Visionaries.

    ‘A new alchemy is being formed which encompasses traditional methods of art, the new technology, and the revolutionary new scientific discoveries.’

    Re-Enchanting the Land. (Woodcock,2000:140)

    ‘When one lacks outer space one creates inner space. Invention becomes more complex, cup and circle markings on stones, intricate Celtic spirals and knots, illuminated manuscripts, gothic architecture with its inherent story telling.’ (Woodcock,2000:131)

    Reading The Landscape.

    What distinguishes Neo-Romanticism from traditional romanticism is the feeling of danger, the juxtaposition of the urban with the countryside, the element of darkness, dissolution, an almost pagan reverie breaking through the ruins of post-industrialism. (Woodcock,2000:55)

    Radio On by Chris Petit.

    The film has a hallucinogenic noir-like quality, a weird hybrid of Fifties Americana and a displaced Britain. It is a seismographic disruption of British culture in a limbo land of displaced dreams, elements of an almost mythical Britain fleetingly appear. (Woodcock,2000:115)

    England Dreaming.

    Throughout John Piper’s long and prolific life he remained fascinated not only with churches, country houses and landscapes but also ancient sites. He comments on the landscape of Snowdonia, ‘Each rock lying in the grass had a positive personality, for the first time I saw the bones and the structure and the lie of mountains, living with them and climbing them as I was, lying on them in the sun and getting soaked with rain in their cloud cover and enclosed in their improbable, private rock-world in fog.’ Piper never dismissed the archaic spirit of place. 

    (Woodcock,2000:31)

    The small ‘Scriptorium’ conceived as a space as a refuge, an intimate minimal construction that features a doorway and an interior that contains a place for objects, perhaps books, as well as a small sitting area. This construction, an open cell perhaps is evocative to a state of contemplation between the fabric of the everyday.

    WATER AND DREAMS

    AN ESSAY ON THE IMAGINATION OF MATTER Gaston Bachelard

    Viscosity/Water in Combination.

    Tacit and intimate contact, relationships and encounters between water and the potter. Water is his/her first auxiliary.

    WORKING NOTES for InDESIGN Document/Mood Board.

    Old Buildings/New Designs: Architectural Transformations. Charles Bloszies. Knocktopher Friary is a quiet place of contemplation. The new residential cloister unifies the friary and the church. The composition of the architecture is a knitting together of two original forms with a ribbon of concrete, glass and wood. The new buildings are crafted from a minimalist vocabulary where the palette of materials was kept to a minimum. One of the interesting design features is that the new elevations never touch the old facades with a solid-to-solid intersection; the new is either set back from the old (Ashley Castle) or the joint is glazed. The existing church floor is used as both a datum for maintaining the new floor level in the new construction, and as a vein of closely controlled changes of materials and finishes. The resultant architecture is played between subtle material exchanges of concrete meeting wood, concrete meeting glass, and concrete meeting concrete with slightly different surface qualities. What results is a clear differentiation between the old and the new, both are remarkably quiet architecturally reflecting the concerns of the site as a Carmelite monastery in the southeast of Ireland.

    Working Thoughts

    The Phenomenology of Reading. GLAS, Derrida Literature and Language.

    Barbed Nature, Pierced Flesh. Graham Sutherland 1903-80

    He never worked in situ but collected information to be worked on in his studio. The detailed sketches and notes he had made when through a transition in his mind before the final painting, culminating therefore in an inner landscape rather than a factual rendition.

    These landscapes were no idyllic reverie but evoked a sense of the mysterious and dangerous. In many ways they emitted a foretaste of the approaching Second World War. (Woodcock,2000:25)

    Ruins, Shadows and Moonlight. Elizabeth Bowen

    “It is a fact, that in Britain, and especially in London, in wartime many people had strange, deep. Intense dreams. We have never dreamed like this before; and I suppose we shall never dream like this again.” Elizabeth Bowen.

    The awareness of the social changes which broke through wartime society is evident in her novels and short stories, the feeling of boundaries being broken, physically, psychologically and also on a spiritual level, where the sense of the living and the unaccounted dead, caused by the bombing, mingle. Her evocative descriptions of the quality of light, the particular smell of a room, of a garden after rain of walking over charred wood and broken glass following an air-raid, and even the effect atmospheres have on the individual all contribute to evoking a strong sense of place. She is a master at conjuring up the minutiae of the everyday world and the presence of another dimension. (Woodcock,2000:74-75)

    Rogue Male. Geoffrey Household.

    The novel evokes the solitude of the landscape as it was before the advent of the mechanisation of farming and the availability of the countryside created by the growth in transport of the following decades. (Woodcock,2000:77)

    Tn the heart of this hedge, which I had been seeking all the way from London, the lane reappears. It is not marked on the map. It has not been used, I imagine, for a hundred years. The deep sandstone cutting, its hedges grown together across the top, is still there; anyone who wishes can dive under the sentinel horns at the entrance and push his way through and come out in a cross hedge that runs along the foot of the hills. But who would wish? Where there is light, the interior of the double hedge is of no conceivable use to the two farmers whose boundary fence it is, and nobody but an adventurous child would want to explore it.’

    Geoffrey Household, Rogue Male 1939.

    The Stride of The Mind

    Reading Rooms. Figuring Space. Text/Fumiture/Dwelling Reading with Paths

    Relativity through Walking and Thinking. Subjectivity. Space – Politics – Affect

    Waverley Abbey. Cistercian Monastery

    The peculiarity of the ruin is defined in that it demythologises the impression of seamlessness and linearity. In the ruin, we are at once removed from dichotomised and levelled down space by entering a place at the threshold of experience. At the threshold, we return to the pre- spatial, if primordial, landscape, yet to submit to the suppression of space and site. Instead the place of ruin creates protrusions, which desolates the category of clean space.

    The Aesthetics of Decay, An Uncanny Place. Dylan Trigg

    Scarpa, extensive use of concrete with different aggregates and finishes.

    Ashley Castle, restoration of ruin into a domestic dwelling, sensitive use of materials and methods of joining or revealing the historical fabric (allowing the ruinous to remain visible) of the building.

    The Dovecote Studio, a building made of CORTEN steel built within the interior of a ruined Victorian dovecote (see further notes).

    Archival / Anarchival

    I would keep this as Research / Working Texts, but regard it as one of the more important research texts in the archive.

    The significance of Bricolage Processes is that bricolage describes a way of working rather than simply a visual technique. Fragments from different origins—images, texts, architectural ideas, memories, materials and observations—are brought into proximity without necessarily being reconciled. The collage becomes a way of producing possibilities rather than illustrating an already formed idea.

    That makes the Theatre of Research particularly important retrospectively. It becomes an early spatial apparatus for what you now describe more tentatively as correspondence: a place where different bodies of material can meet, interfere with one another and produce something that wasn’t present in any individual component.

    The later re-reading of this material is especially valuable. You explicitly describe the earlier Scriptorium, Theatre of Research, reading room, collage and indexical body as spaces that did not simply contain experience but altered the conditions through which experience could occur.

    That feels very close to your present understanding of making.

    The research isn’t simply about other things. It creates situations in which the things being encountered can change the conditions of the encounter itself.

    This is where I think your phrase “diffractive scaffoldings” becomes useful. A scaffold does not determine what will happen; it gives something a provisional structure within which other relations can develop. Likewise, the bricolage process gathers without completely containing.

    Migration judgement

    High-value archive — retain and foreground.

    I would put this alongside The Scriptorium, Formwork / Enclosures / Iterations, and Spatial Practices: An Affective Intensity as a small constellation.

    Together they reveal an important continuity:

    bricolage → scaffold → situation → spatial body → correspondence

    And there is an especially useful distinction emerging here. Your earlier research often used architecture as the scaffold for thinking. The ceramic work now seems to allow matter itself to become the scaffold.

    Clay receives fragments of gesture, pressure, drawing, fire, memory and material resistance. But, just as with the earlier bricolage, it doesn’t simply hold them in place. It changes their relations.

    That is why I think this post is more significant than its “creative audit” title initially suggests. It contains an early version of something that has become much more central to your practice:

    making as the construction of provisional conditions in which other bodies can begin to think with one another.

    And that connects very directly to your recent formulation that you are interested in “an attentiveness to situations as a kind of spatial theorizing that is itself exploratory and experimenting with other bodies.”

    I think Bricolage Processes is one of the places where that idea is already becoming visible.