Curriculum Making : The Enactment of Dwelling in Places.
Re-entering / 2026 — Dwelling is no longer simply inhabiting a place. It becomes a way of learning through the material relations of body, surface, space and movement.
This is worth keeping as an ancestral chamber in the archive. The newer work can now read its “dwelling” less as a theory of habitation and more as a material condition of correspondence: bodies, clay, architecture and place learning through their encounters.
What shall I do next?
Tim Ingold
Re-registering Overlapping Spaces
Source: Curriculum Making : The Enactment of Dwelling in Places.
Archival / Anarchival
This is a significant bridge post because it brings together several strands that have since become central to your practice: dwelling, active inhabitation, material-relational knowledge, spatial learning, permeability, ceramic bodies and the relationship between body, surface, volume and void.
The strongest conceptual thread is the move away from knowledge as representation towards knowledge as something enacted through inhabitation. The post explicitly draws on Ingold’s argument that meaning emerges through active dwelling rather than through mental representations of the world.
It also contains an important early formulation of “vessels for relationships between movements”. That now reads particularly well against your current understanding of the ceramic body as a threshold or chamber rather than simply a container.
I would therefore move this from Uncategorized → Spatial Practice, while retaining curriculum making as a tag. It is fundamentally about how spatial practice becomes a mode of learning and dwelling.













Leave a Reply